home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
A.C.E. 2
/
ACE CD 2.iso
/
FILES
/
DOCS
/
GS2000D.LHA
/
Gunship2000Part2.doc1
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-11-27
|
137KB
|
2,985 lines
_____
/__ /\ ________ T.H.E ____________
// __\_____ \/\________ \_______ _________
___ __/ / /\\ \ .\_____ \/\ /. / /\ ____ ____ ___
Y \______ / \ \ \\ _ \ \// / \___ _ _\ Y
. \_____/ / \ \________/\\ \ \____ / /\ \\ .
\/ \_______/\ \____________/ / \ \ ______/[Sk!n]
\_______/ \/ \ \_____/
[Simply Nutty] \/
-+------------------------------------------------------------------------+-
| The LoOnS: Python Wizz The Guardian PoB Action Man Chuck T-Leaf |
-+------------------------------------------------------------------------+-
Part 2
/--------------------------*----------------------------------\
;| PrOuDlY PrEsEnTs |,
| |
/ FuLl EnGlIsH DoCs FoR: \
:\ /:
. | -> GUNSHIP 2000 FROM MICROPROSE <- | .
| |
\--------------------------*----------------------------------/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 85
THE HELICOPTER
--------------
HISTORY OF DEVELOPMENT
Leonardo Da Vinci is widely considered to be the "Father of the
Helicopter". In the late 15th Century, Da Vinci developed the first
theories of flight, and designed a screw-like rotary wing. Da Vinci had
theorised that air has "substance", or density, and that a lifting force
could be generated by pushing down against it; it would, theoretically,
bore through the substance of the air like an auger bit through wood.
While a full-size version od Da Vinci's helix never flew, some small
working models were produced. The problems that faced Da Vinci's craft
would confront every would-be-inventor of a self-propelled helicopter. The
power plant and structure of the aircraft needed to be kept low, the torque
produced by the spinning propellors had to be counteracted, and the craft
had to be controlled.
The next significant step toward rotary-winged flight occured in 1783, at
the World's Fair in Paris. Two Frenchmen, Launoy and Bienvenu, created a
toy rotary-winged craft with four feathered propellors. The propoellors
were placed on either end of what was basically a stick, and turned
independently of one another in opposite directions.
The toy, driven by a wind-up bent-bow system, managed to fly up to
altitudes of seventy feet, and provided a great deal of inspiration for
other inventors. But they still lacked a propulsion plant strong enough to
generate the lift needed to get larger craft airborne. It would be nearly
another hundred years before inventors would have any significant success.
In 1862, another Fronchman named Ponton D'Amecourt developed a steam
powered helicopter. The craft had coaxial propellors, counter-rotating
wings spinning about the same axis. The helicopter's steam engine was made
of aluminium, and weighed only four pounds. While the power-to-weight
ratio of the craft was still too low for it to get airborne, it bobbed and
bounced on the ground on the threshold of flight. This alone encouraged
inventors to continue.
By 1870, an Italian inventor, Enrico Forianni, met with some success. His
steam-powered coaxial helicopter weighed only six and a half pounds, but it
managed to fly up to heights of 40 feet and for a duration of 20 minutes.
Rotary flight, albeit unmanned, was a reality. But the hurdles to manned
flight - the power-to-weight ratio and control of flight - still remained.
The first breakthrough in manned rotary flight would not come until 1907,
four years after the Wright brothers' first flight at Kitty Hawk. The
development of internal combustion engines had finally produced a power
plant with a sufficient power-to-weight ratio to be effective, and yet
another Frenchman, Paul Cornu, set out to take advantage of that new
technology.
His craft had dual rotors, one placed forward and the other at the rear of
the fuselage. Each rotor measured twenty feet in diameter. The rotors
were connected by drive belts to a 24 H.P. internal combustion engine.
For control of flight, Cornu had placed tilted vanes below each rotor.
The belts slipped and the rotors spun unevenly, but Cornu's helicopter
became airborne. His flight was short, and he only managed to rise a few
feet above the ground, but he had flown!
Many other helicopter designs followed; but for the next ten years, few met
with any greater success than Cornu's. Control remained the greatest
problem. And while World War 1 had a drastic effect on the evolution of
the airplane, it produced few advances in the development of powered
rotary-wing flight.
The 1920's saw two major steps forward in rotary wing aircraft design. The
first was in 1922, when Raul Pateras, an Argentinian, built (with the
backing of the French military) a coaxial helicopter with controlled-pitch
propellors. The controllable pitch of the rotor blades while in flight
increased the manoevreability, and the craft also demonstrated the effect
of autorotation - allowing the rotors to spin freely in unpowered flight to
slow descent.
Page 87
The second major step forward came not in the form of a helicopter, but
from an entirely different aircraft. Juan de la Cierva, a Spanish airplane
designer, decided to investigate rotary winged flight in 1924, and soon
after unveiled an entirely new type of aircraft - the autogiro.
Rather than using a powered rotary wing for lift, the autogiro has a freely
rotating overhead wing that is allowed to windmill. The forward motion of
the aircraft through the air, generated by the thrust of a conventional
propellor, causes the rotor to generate lift. Consequently, the autogiro
cannot hover; but it can take off and land in a substantially smaller area
than conventional aircraft. In 1928, Cierva flew his autogiro acrosss the
English Channel, attaining an airspeed of nearly 100 M.P.H.
The autogiro found its way into the hands of the military in limited
numbers, mostly for evaluation purposes. One was the first rotary aircraft
flown off a ship, launched from the carrier USS Langley on September 23,
1931; another was evaluated by the Marine Corps during operations in
Nicaragua in 1932. Admiral Richard E. Byrd used an autogiro during his
exploration of the Antarctic in 1933 and 1934, and the Army tested several
autogiros between 1935 and 1938.
Page 88
But all of these were "off the shelf" civilian models, and little more was
done with the craft. Some military applications, such as anti-submarine
warfare and artillery spotting, were noted, but there was little real
interest in further development; its low payload capacity and its inability
to take off vertically made it unsuitable for what the military had in
mind.
WORLD WAR TWO
The Second World War accelerated the development of helicopters
dramatically, especially in Germany. The first truly practical helicopter,
the Focke-Achgelis Fa61, was built for the Third Reich by Dr. Heinrich
Karl Johann Focke, and flew for the first time on June 23rd, 1936 (even
though he had been marked by the Nazis as being "politically unsafe").
The Fa61 was a single-seat aircraft, with side-by-side three-bladed rotors
and a conventional propellor for forward thrust. Both the rotors and the
propellor were powered by a single 160 H.P. engine.
The craft proved difficult to fly at first; eventually, it was mastered by
Hanna Reitsch, one of Germany`s most respected test pilots. In February of
1938 she flew the Fa61 in the Berlin Deutschlandhall sports arena,
demonstrating the helicopter's incredible handling characteristics. She
later described the experience as "intoxicating".
Reitsch and the Fa61 went on to set numerous records for rotary flight
between 1937 and 1939, proving the practicality and reliability of the
helicopter once and for all. Among its records were a top speed of 77 MPH,
a distance of 143 miles, and an altitude of 11,243 feet.
While Dr. Focke did not intend the helicopter for military applications,
the Nazis had other ideas. Another German, Anton Flettner,designedd what
is considered to be the world's first military helicopter - the F1 282
Kolibri. The Kolibri had twin counter-rotating propellers that turned in
synchronisation, their planes of rotation intermeshing. Flettner's Kolibri
flew for the first time in 1940, and by 1942 was operational on German
airships and escorts in the Mediterranean, Aegean, and Baltic seas.
Eventually, a modification of the Kolibri was used for anti-submarine
warfare.
Page 89
Another Focke design, the Fa 233 Drache, was the world's first transport
heLicOpter. The Drache, which carried six passengers and cOuld carry a
cargo load suspeNded from a cable, waS tested extensively for use as a
general purpose transport for mountain troops. Allied bombing raids
destroyed all but seven, and by 1945 only three remained serviceable.
These were formed into the first (and only) WWII helicopter squadron,
Transportstaffel 40.
While more Fa 233's were built, only one additional helicopter was ever
completed. At the end of the war, only two operational helicopters
remained.
In the United States, Igor Sikorsky's Sikorsky Aircraft Company received a
contract from the U.S. Army for a two-passenger observation helicopter.
Sikorsky had earlier demonstrated a prototype helicopter, the VS-300, and
the success of that aircraft had finally drawn the interest of the Army
back to rotary-winged flight.
In January of 1942, Sikorsky's Army prototype, the XR-4 flew for the first
time. By the time it was delivered to the Army on May 17th, 1942, it had
practically broken all of the existing helicopter records. The U.S.
military was now thoroughly convinced of the helicopter's potential.
The R-4's design, like Sikorsky's VS-300 before it , utilised a single
rotor with three blades, and a tail rotor to counteract the torque of the
main rotor. This design set the standard for the great majority of
American helicopters that followed it.
By the end of WWII, over four hundred Sikorsky helicopters of three designs
were flying for the Army, Navy and Coast Guard, and for the British Navy
and RAF. They served as scouts, delivered mail to ships at sea, and served
as rescue craft during carrier operations. In addition, the growing need
for anti-submarine platforms gave the helicopter an active combat mission
in fleet operations; with the advent of the dipping sonar in the mid-40's,
the helicopter became a viable sub-hunter.
Page 89
In 1944, the helicopter saw its first duty as a combat search and rescue
(C-SAR) and medevac craft, during operations in Burma. In April of that
year, Sikorsky R-4 helicopters attached to the US Army's First Air Commando
Group, based at Hailakandi, India were fitted with fuel tanks from
fixed-wing aircraft to extend their range, and were flown behind enemy
lines to rescue the crew and passengers of a light British medevac
aircraft. The mission was a success, and the R-4 was called upon almost
daily afterward for other SAR missions.
MALAYA AND KOREA
The first real conflict in which helicopters were used extensively was the
Malayan Emergency, a counter-insurgency war fought by the British for
twelve years beginning in 1948. By the time the Korean War began, the
British already had nearly 40,000 troops fighting a guerilla war against
Chinese-backed communist insurgents. British forces depended heavily upon
helicopters in the jungle war, for medical evacuation, troop transport,
observation and reconnaissance. The operational flexibility of the
helicopters, along with their ability to deploy and retrieve troops in
jungle terrain, proved their worth in combat beyond the shadow of a doubt.
The Korean War was to US helicopter aviation what the Malayan Emergency was
to the British. During the course of the war, the helicopter was used by
all four branches of the armed forces, and tactics were developed for their
use.
While the helicopter was primarily used for transport, medevac, SAR, and
reconnaissance by all of the services, there was some unofficial
experimentation with gunship tactics. For the first time, helicopters
became a threat to enemy troops.
The first shots fired in anger from a helicopter were from a US Navy
helicopter in January 1951. Lieutenant, j.g. John W. Thorton and his
crewman, Petty Officer Whitaker, experimented with light attack helicopter
tactics by firing .45 calibre pistols and carbine rifles and dropping
grenades from their HO3S-1 on North Korean troops. If fragmentation
grenades were not available, LTJG Thorton would obtain percussion grenades
and tape nails to them, so they could "nail them to a tree".
These tactics did not endear Thorton to the North Koreans, nor to his
fellow pilots. The North Koreans quickly learned that the helicopter was a
potential threat, and soon were firing upon all they saw.
Page 91
The HO3S-1 had been the subject of another experimentation in helicopter
armament a year earlier, at Lakehurst Naval Air Station in New Jersey.
Mechanics at Helicopter Utility Squadron (HU-1) attempted to install
swivel-gun mounts with .30 and .50 calibre machine guns in the doors of a
helicopter. Unfortunately, the airframe wasn't strong enough to support
the guns and when they were fired they nearly ripped the sides of the
aircraft off. The experiment was only slightly ahead of its time.
The Army experimented with the idea of an armed helicopter during the war.
The need for armament aboard helicopters became apparent when the H-19
troop transport helicopter was deployed to Korea - it proved to be
extremely vulnerable during troop assault landings. The Army tried
mounting a bazooka on an H-13 helicopter in 1950, with little success;
three years later, the Army tried a grenade launcher, with the same result.
American experience with the helicopter during Korea led to the development
of the "Air Cavalry" concept. General Matthew B. Ridgeway, who had seen
the importance of the helicopter in Korea, reorganised Army aviation in
January 1955, and laid the foundation for the modern "Air Cav".
Accompanying this new organisational concept was that of "Helicopter
Gunship".
In 1956, the Army began testing various types of helicopter armament again
with the goal of providing an effective suppressive fire during assault
landings. Air Cavalry units experimented with .30 and .50 calibre machine
guns, rockets and various cannons. Eventually, these experiments led to
the formation of an aerial combat recon company in 1958.
ALGERIA
The French would be the first to apply the gunship concept under actual
combat conditions. During the bloody French-Algerian War, the French Army
and Air Force applied the American experience with helicopter armament to
their Vertol H-21's twin rotor helicopters originally built for troop
transport.
The French used several mixes of armament, from .30 and .50 calibre machine
guns to 37mm rockets and 20mm cannon in their war against the Muslim
rebels. The French also armoured their helicopters, using self-sealing gas
tanks and fibreglass armour plating around engine compartments and the
cockpit. After adding weaponry and armour to their helicopters, the French
did not lose any helicopters to ground fire. The French also pioneered the
development of a helicopter-launched anti-tank missile in 1958.
Page 91
VIETNAM
While the French had some success with the use of the helicopter during the
French-Algerian War, in the end they were forced to quit Algeria, granting
their former colony independance. The helicopter alone could not win a
guerilla war. Still, the utility of the armed helicopter had been proven,
and important lessons had been learned about its employment.
But the real test of "Gunship" weapons and tactics would come with the
escalation of a war in another former French Colony - Vietnam.
The Vietnam War has often been called the "Helicopter War" because of the
pivotal role that helicopters played in all aspects of the conflict. US
forces depended heavily on the helicopter because of its utility and
flexibility in an environment similar to that faced by the British in
Malaya during the early 50's. During the conflict, more helicopters, and
more types of helicopters, would be used than ever before. Some eighteen
types of helicopters were flown by US pilots over the course of the war
(many of which are still in service today in some capacity). The war also
saw the first widespread use of gas-turbine powered helicopters in all
facets of operations.
The first gas turbine powered helicopter deployed to Vietnam became a
symbol of the war itself - the UH-1 Iroquois, more commonly known as the
Huey. First delivered to the Army in 1959, the Huey was commonly referred
to early on as a "Helicopter Ambulance," despite its multi-role design.
The Huey was remarkably successful in all its roles, and eventually over
9,000 were built - many are still in service.
The UH-1B Huey became the first true helicopter gunship. It was built with
universal wiring and "hard points" for the attachment of various weapons
systems. Three weapons were used by the UH-1B; the XM-6 quad (four 7.62mm
machine guns and four grenade launchers mounted in pairs on each side of
the ship), the XM-3 rocket pod system (two pods of 24 2.75 inch rockets),
and the SS-11 guided anti-tank missile (three guided missiles mounted on
each side of the helicopter). While the XM-3 and SS-11 systems were not
available early, the XM-6 quad was almost universally in use as early as
1962, giving the Huey a lethal punch.
Huey's 1A's were also equipped with weaponry, though their lower turbine
power and lack of universal wiring limited the range of weapons available.
They were equipped with two fixed rocket pods and two .30 calibre machine
guns, mounted on the skids of the aircraft.
Page 93
The first Huey 1A's and 1B's to arrive in Vietnam were organised into the
Utility Tactical Transport Helicopter Company (UTTHCO). The 1B's proved to
be much more flexible in meeting the needs of the local commanders. Almost
as important as the 1B's better armament mix was its higher shaft power,
essential for manoevreability in the high humidity of Vietnam. The
gunships provided light close-in fire support for assault landings of
airborne troops, and were essential to the evolution of "airmobility"
strategy of the US Army
The "airmobility" concept emerged in the early 60's as a product of a study
by a board of Army officers convened by Secretary of Defence Robert
MacNamara. The Army Tactical Mobility Requirements Board, also known as
the "Howze Board" ( for its Chairman, General Hamilton H. Howze, an
experienced Airborne commander), recommeded the substitution of helicopters
for a large amount of the Army's ground transportation. All Army units
would be equipped with 360 air vehicles to every 2000 wheeled land
vehicles.
The committee also recommended the formations of specialised, completely
airmobile "air assault divisions". The concept of the Air Assault Division
was tested by a skeleton division formed at Fort Benning, Georgia, in 1964.
During exercises in North and South Carolina, the division proved itself
against the 82nd Airborne.
The Secretary of Defence recognised the effectiveness of such a unit, and
gave the Army the approval to proceed with organisation of the first
airmobile division. The division selected for this honour was the famed
1st Cavalry Division. On July 28th, 1965, President Johnson ordered the
1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile) to Vietnam.
As the war escalated, and helicopters took increasing amounts of ground
fire from heavy anti-aircraft weapons, it became apparent that a dedicated
helicopter gunship was needed. The UH-1B, while highly successful, was
limited in its capabilities - it was, after all, just a modified logistics
helicopter. Bell Helicopter had forseen the Army's need, and was preparing
to meet it. In 1966, the Army ordered its first true gunship - the Bell
AH-1 Huey Cobra.
The Cobra was based on the UH-1B, but had some major innovations. The
airframe was narrow, presenting a very small head-on target. The very look
of the helicopter suggested its purpose - it was death from above for the
enemy.
Page 94
The first Huey Cobra went to Vietnam in 1968. Perhaps their most famous
role in the war was the operations conducted by Ah-1's over the Ho Chi Minh
Trail, ambushing North Vietnamese and Viet Cong supply trains. It was
during these ambushes that Cobra pilots developed tactics like "Cobra
Stacking", flying one above the other to maximise the amount of ordnance
brought to bear on a small target.
But the AH-1s also earned their keep in the troop transport escort role as
well, protecting assault helicopter landings and providing "instantaneous
fire suppression". The Marine Corps found them vital to carrying out their
mission.
With a broad range of weaponry, high speed and high manoevreability; the
Cobra proved to be a very imprtant asset to American field commanders; its
success insured the long line of gunships that followed it. Many other
nations have copied it, and the Army and Marine Corps use modifications of
the AH-1 (particularly the AH-1W Super Cobra) to this day.
Vietnam was the proving ground for American gunships; for the Soviets,
Afghanistan served a similar role.
AFGHANISTAN
While the Soviets had been pioneers in heavy lift helicopter design and
construction, and had been arming helicopters since the early 50's, their
first helicopter gunship was not introduced until 1972. The Mi-24 Hind-A
was really a heavily armed and highly mobile transport helicopter. It is
believed that the Hind-A was designed to act as its own fire support during
troop insertions; the Soviet staff believed at the time that they could not
afford a large number of single-purpose helicopters.
Soviet attitudes about gunships changed over time, and the Hind went
through a series of modifications. The Hind-D was equipped with a nose-
mounted Gatling gun. Still, the Hind-E, introduced in 1976, can carry up
to ten troops with its full weapons load. With its weaponry and heavy
armour, the Hind is comparable to a very fast and manoevreable flying
armoured personnel carrier.
In December of 1979, the Soviets invaded Afghanistan under the pretenses of
an invitation by the Afghan Government. By mid-January, the Soviets had
more than 75,000 troops in the country.
Page 95
The Hind gunship was the workhorse of Soviet aviation in Afghanistan;
nearly 200 of them were deployed by January of 1983. The Hind served in a
role similar to that of the Cobra in Vietnam, escorting troop transports on
assaults on guerilla concentrations. But like the French in Algeria and
the Americans in Vietnam, the Soviets faced an enemy that enjoyed
considerable freedom of movement, superior knowledge of the terrain and had
the will to fight. The Mujahadeen also had US made Stinger anti-aircraft
missiles, a great threat to the Soviet helicopter forces.
One Soviet soldier said after the war, "You could tell when a landing zone
was hot by the number of assault troops they put on a helicopter. The more
men a (Hind) had to land, the longer it was vulnerable to guerilla fire.
If you had four or five to a helicopter, it wasn't too bad. If you had two
or three to a helicopter, you knew it was really bad."
As the threat to Soviet helicopters increased, more and more infrared
decoys (essentially flares) were carried to draw away the Stingers of the
Mujahadeen. And the Soviets also reportedly deployed chemical weapons in
large numbers from Hinds.
GRENADA - OPERATION URGENT FURY
In 1983, the US and a coalition of Caribbean States invaded the isle of
Grenada to overthrow the oppressive Marxist military junta that had
recently taken power.
During the invasion, code-named Operation Urgent Fury, US Army and Marine
forces met stiff resistance from Cuban "advisor" forces, and fought a
heavily armed and fortified force holed up in the island's fortress prison.
AH-1 Cobra gunships proved their versatility and, unfortunately, their
vulnerability during engagements with these forces. Army Cobras and Marine
SeaCobras provided close air support and assaulted the fortress with TOW
missiles, but two of them were lost to ground fire.
Other Marine helicopter forces were used in the mission to rescue American
students at the St. George's Medical School. These Marine Sea Knights
were used as well for "vertical development" assaults on the island in the
early stages of the operation.
Page 96
Lasting only a few days, the operation is not considered to be one of the
high points in US military history. It's generally felt that US forces
were ill prepared for the level of opposition, and rushed into the
operation with too little planning. In any event,its effects went a long
way to shape the future of helicopter operations.
THE APACHE IS BORN
In the early 70's the US Army sought a heavy gunship in the form of the
AH-56 Cheyenne. The program was cancelled, however, and for the remainder
of the decade, the only heavy helicopter gunships in the US inventory were
on paper. The Cobra was called upon to fill the gap.
The 70's saw an increased emphasis on the anti-armour capability of the
helicopter gunship. With the addition of the TOW missile to the Cobra (and
later the SuperCobra), and similar weapons to the helicopters of other
nations, the gunship was becoming a real "force multiplier", with greater
anti-armour capability than most ground units.
In 1976, the Hughes Aircraft designed an all-weather heavy helicopter
gunship, the AH-64 Apache. It would be stuck in development for another
six years before the production line got rolling. In the meantime, the US
invaded Grenada in 1983. The Cobra provided the only dedicated gunship
capabilities available at the time.
Now fully operational, the Apache is the front-line anti-armour aircraft of
the US army. The AH-64 marks the true beginning of a new generation of
helicopter gunships - highly automated, heavily armed, and capable of
combat in all weather, night or day. While the airframe is essentially a
conventional helicopter, the advanced electronic systems aboard the Apache
make it the link to future helicopter gunships. It is being considered for
a number of other mission areas, including anti-ship missions.
There is still a great deal of debate as to which type of helicopter
technology should be the basis of the next generation of gunship.
OPERATION JUST CAUSE
In the early months of 1989, relations between the US government and the
regime of General Manuel Noreiga in Panama were rapidly deteriorating, and
by the end of spring, events had reached a flash-point. After a number of
violent incidents, including the killing of an off-duty American soldier by
Panamanian Defence Force (PDF) troops, the crisis escalated, and the US
mounted an invasion of Panama to remove Noriega and put the elected
president of Panama in power. Operation Just Cause, as the invasion was
called by the military, lasted only a few days, but it demonstrated the
lethality of modern weapons.
Page 97
Operation Just Cause saw the first use of Apache helicopters in actual
combat. AH-64A Apaches were used in the attack on the PDF Commendencia in
downtown Panama City - the helicopters were used against targets on
individual floors of the building. Ground based laser designators were
utilised to pinpoint targets for the deadly accurate Hellfire missiles.
While there was no opposition to US helicopters during the operation, the
Apache proved itself an effective weapon nonetheless.
THE PERSIAN GULF - OPERATIONS DESERT STORM AND SABRE
The Apache would get its first real test on the battlefield during the
quick and bloody war with Iraq in January and February of 1991. On August
5th 1990, Saddam Hussein's army invaded the city-state of Kuwait, and
Hussein proclaimed its annexation. The US quickly mobilised a coalition of
nations to come to the defence of Saudi Arabia, and began putting pressure
on Iraq to withdraw from Kuwait.
By January, the US had completed the largest deployment of troops since
Vietnam, and was ready to take back Kuwait by force. With the aid of the
British, Italian, French, Saudi and Kuwaiti air forces, an air offensive
was launched on January 16th against Iraqi forces in Kuwait and Iraq.
Apache gunships played a significant role in the early air campaign,
attacking Iraqi positions in both Kuwait and Iraq.
The first mission for the AH-64 came during the first hours of the war. On
the night of January 17th, Apaches were sent in to take out two Iraqi
electronics installations near the Saudi-Iraqi border. The Apaches
launched Hellfire missiles at several targets in Kuwait and Iraq, including
mobile air defence and electronic sites. All objective targets were
destroyed. In some cases, it was reported that Special Forces Troops
provided forward laser designation for Hellfires launched from Apache
gunships.
The night fighting abilities of the Apache were used heavily during the
first phase of the war. Apaches were used against a variety of fortified
targets during night operations, including Iraqi artillery batteries and
radar sites. Iraqi forces attempted to begin ground war on their own terms
in early February by invading the Saudi coastal city of Kafji. Apache
helicopters took part in a night time assault on the Iraqi armoured forces
there, and during combat accidentally fired on US armoured vehicles,
killing two American soldiers. This incident highlights the hazard of the
modern battlefield, where smoke, fire and darkness can make it difficult to
seperate the enemy from friendlies on the ground.
Page 98
With allied air superiority established. Apache gunships and other
helicopter forces raided the Iraqi rear at will. On February 20th, OH-58D
Kiowa Warriors and AH-64A Apaches destroyed "fifteen to thirty" Iraqi
bunkers in Kuwait, and 421 Iraqi soldiers surrendered to them. Only one US
serviceman was killed in the operation.
In the early hours of February 24th, a combined allied air-ground offensive
began. The operation, codenamed Desert Sabre, lasted 100 hours, and nearly
completely destroyed the Iraqi armed forces in and around Kuwait. Apache
and Cobra gunships played an important part in the offensive, taking part
in some of the largest armoured battles since WWII. In fact, the first
shots fired during the operation were by Apache gunships.
The 1st Marine Division was assigned one of the more difficult missions of
the offensive - a frontal assault on the Iraqi defence lines in Kuwait.
After punching through Iraqi fortifications, the division pushed on towards
Kuwait City. In a battle with an Iraqi armoured brigade and mechanised
infantry brigade near the Burquan oil fields. Marine AH-1W SuperCobras and
ground forces destroyed about 30 enemy vehicles. This battle proved to be
only a prelude to the tank battle that would follow at Kuwait International
Airport, where an estimated 310 Iraqi tanks were destroyed.
To the west, the 101st Airborne began a heliborne assault into Iraq, with
over 460 Blackhawk, Apache and other helicopters. Their operation,
nicknamed "Cobra", severed Iraqi roads along the Tigris and Euphrates
rivers, and cut off the only Iraqi escape route to the north.
On February 28th, the operation ended, having taken over 80,000 Iraqi POW's
and having destroyed or "rendered ineffective" at least 40 of the 42 Iraqi
divisions. No US aircraft were downed during the last phase of the war - a
tribute to the level of organisation planning employed and to the men and
women that took part in the operation.
The operation more than reaffirmed the role of the helicopter in modern
combat operations.
Page 99
THE U.S. ARMY
Today, the Army deploys its helicopters as integral parts of nearly every
type of division, from light infantry to heavy armour. As a result, the
battlefield commander of any Army formation will have some "organic air
support" within his assets. The highest concentration of helicopters of
all types is within the airborne and air assault divisions; within a
typical air assault division, for example, there is one full squadron of
air cavalry and an aviation brigade consisting of eight helicopter
battalions.
The air cavalry squadron's primary missions are "airmobility" and
reconnaissance, so its aircraft will be of the troop transport variety -
UH-60 Blackhawks and probably a few UH-1 Hueys. In addition, the squadron
will have some AH-1 Cobra gunships for escort and air reconnaissance.
A squadron will usually have about 950 soldiers assigned to it; 70
commissioned officers, 100 warrant officers and 780 enlisted men. These
personnel are divided among the squadron's four "troops" and headquarters
"troop". A single troop of air cavalry will have about 200 men assigned,
with 15 commissioned officers and 32 warrant officers among them.
The aviation brigade within an air assault division is made up of some 1000
personnel, and is broken down into four mission groups, assault, medium
lift, command and attack. Two assault helicopter battalions are dedicated
to the combat troop transport mission, and are equipped with UH-60;s. The
medium lift helicopter battalion, equipped with CH-47 Chinook cargo
helicopters, provides logistical air support for the division, while the
command helicopter battalion provides administrative, scouting, and command
and control support for the division commander with its UH-1 Hueys and
OH-58 Kiowa scouts.
The other four battalions of helicopters in the aviation brigade are attack
helicopter battalions. These units are equipped with a mixture of
aircraft, including AH-64 Apaches, OH-58 Kiowas and probably some AH-1S
SuperCobras. These units are manned by some 20 commissioned officers, 44
warrant officers, and 177 enlisted men per battalion.
In addition to these air assets, the division will also have an air
ambulance company assigned to its medical battalion, equipped with UH-1
helicopters and dedicated to air medical evacuation.
The number and types of helicopters that are assigned to a unit may vary
with the theatre of operations that they are assigned to and their level of
readiness.
Page 100
There are large numbers of helicopters considered "obsolete" for front line
troops that have been widely spread through the Army's aviation reserve
units. As demonstrated during Operations Desert Shield, Storm & Sabre,
these units may quickly find themselves on or near the front of any
conflict of arms.
The number and type of helicopters assigned to a mission group during
operations will also vary widely, depending on the theatre of operations,
the mission objective, and other forces deployed in the area. For example,
a formation of Apaches may be supported by Special Forces units on the
ground (with laser designators for their Hellfire missiles), or they may
need a Kiowa scout configured for laser designation to accompany them if
there are no forward forces to support them. The terrain, battlefield
conditions, and weather may all be factors in deciding the number and type
of aircraft to assign to any specific mission.
Page 101
---------------------
FLYING THE HELICOPTER
---------------------
Flying a helicopter is a lesson in the physics of vectors. It places a
great demand on the ability of the pilot to simultaneously control each of
the factors affecting the flight of his aircraft. The following material
only begins to scratch the surface of the intricacies of rotary-wing
flight.
THE BASIC FORCES
The four basic forces, or vectors, that act on all aircraft are gravity
(which pulls the craft down), lift (which pushes it up), thrust (which
moves the craft horizontally), and drag (resistance against thrust).These
four forces, and to what degree they act on aircraft determine if and how
well it flies. Changing the weight, lifting surfaces, thrusting power and
airframe shape all change the vectors that act on an aircraft and,
consequently, change its flight characteristics.
LIFT, THRUST AND THE HELICOPTER
Helicopters and airplanes both get their lift from an airfoil - a shape
that creates lift from relative motion through the air. An airfoil is
shaped so that the air moving across the top of it must travel further than
air crossing along its bottom; this creates a condition known as the
Venturi effect, in which an area of low air pressure is created above the
airfoil. As a result, the airfoil is drawn upward into the low pressure
area, creating a lifting force.
Conventional airplanes depend on the relative motion of air across their
fixed wings, caused by forward motion, to create the lift necessary for
them to get and remain airborne. As a result, lift for an airplane follows
the thrust of its engines; the more thrust available, the more lift an
airplane can get out of its wings; or the less wing surface it needs to
generate that lift.
Helicopters, on the other hand, get all of their lift and thrust from one
source - the rotor blades; these are the helicopter's "wings". Since the
helicopter spins its lifting surfaces through the air, it creates the
relative motion necessary to generate lift without having to move the whole
helicopter through the air. This is why helicopters can hover and manoevre
at low speeds.
Unlike the wing of an airplane, the blades of a helicopter's rotor are
symmetrical - the top and bottom of each blade is shaped the same. Thus,
if they were allowed to spin perfectly flat, they would provide no lift at
all. The difference in surface area needed to create lift is achieved by
changing the pich, or angle, of the blades. By increasing the tilt of the
rotor blades, a helicopter can essentially take a bigger :bite: out of the
air and create more lift.
Page 102
The helicopter's directional thrust -the force that moves it horizontally-
is created by tilting the plane of the rotor blades' spin. When the rotor
is tilted, it pulls the helicopter in the direction of the tilt, as well as
providing lift.
There are four basic configurations for helicopter rotors. The most common
is what the British call the "Penny and Fathing" - the single overhead
rotor with a small stabilising tail rotor. The smaller rotor counteracts
the torque generated by the main rotor. Another common rotor configuration
is the twin tandem - two rotors, one forward and one aft. The rotors
revolve in opposite directions to counteract each others torque.
The twin side-by-side is not very common among military helicopters. In
this configuration, the rotors are mounted on the side of the helicopter,
and often intermesh. Several commercial helicopters manufactured by Kaman
used this design. The coaxial rotor configuration is most commonly used by
Soviet helicopter designers, and can be seen in the Hormone, Helix, and the
new Hokum helicopters. Two counter-rotating sets of rotor blades revolve
about the same axis, counteracting each other's torque.
DISSYMETRY AND ASYMMETRY OF LIFT
Since a helicopter's rotor blades spin about an axis, the relative speed of
air over the rotor blades is slower toward the inside of the blade and
faster toward the tip of the blade. This means that a greater amount of
lift will be created at the tip ofs the blades, so the blades will tend to
bend up at the ends. This is known as dissymetry of lift.
Page 103
Also, if the helicopter is moving forward, one side of the rotor (the side
spinning towards the direction of movement will have a higher relative air
speed than the other (spinning away from the direction of movement). This
effect is called asymmetry of lift. The effect, first noted by Juan de la
Cierva during his development of the autogiro in the 20's, tends to make
rotary-winged craft roll to one side unless it is compensated for. In most
cases, helicopter designers have adjusted to this effect by hinging the
blades, allowing them to rise slightly while they spin forward.
TORQUE
Since the helicopter's rotor blades are spinning, another force is exerted
on the helicopter - torque. When a helicopter has only one rotor, the
torque generated by that rotor tends to turn the helicopter in a direction
opposite of the spin of the rotor blades. This is counteracted in most
helicopters by a tail rotor, which pushes back against the torque. In
helicopters with two rotor blades, the rotors spin in opposite directions
and the torque is cancelled out.
Torque can also be used to the helicopter's advantage. Torque, in
conjunction with the tail rotor, can be used to help turn the helicopter in
flight, and pivot the helicopter about its axis when it's hovering.
HOVERING
To hover a helicopter, the cyclic must be held at centre, so that the
helicopter does not gain airspeed in any direction. The collective
controls keep the helicopter at a constant altitude, while the rudder
pedals keep the helicopter pointed in one direction. Since the air is a
dynamic environment, the pilot must constantly adjust these controls to
maintain the hover.
When a helicopter is in a hover or in slow forward flight close to the
ground, it creates an effect known as ground cushion. Air forced down by
the rotors cannot escape quickly and is compressed between the helicopter
and the ground. This, in turn, increases the efficiency of the
helicopter's engine and rotor blades.
Page 106
FLIGHT FORWARD
To accelerate a helicopter forward from a hover, the pilot pushes the
cyclic forward and pulls up on the collective. More lift is generated by
the rotors as the collective is pulled up, and this lift is converted to
forward thrust as the rotor (and the helicopter) is tilted forward by the
collective.
As the helicopter shifts from a hover to forward flight, the helicopter
settles towards the ground. This is because of a slight loss of lift as
some of the helicopter's lift is converted to thrust, and it "slips off"
the ground cushion. But when the helicopter has gained some forward
momentum, it also gains what is called "translational lift" - the
additional lift generated by the relative motion created in horizontal
flight. As the heLicOpter accelerates fOrward, the traNSlational lift
grows. However, this additional lifting efficiency is cancelled out by
other effects once the helicopter reaches about 90kts forward speed.
When the helicopter is straight, level flight, the cyclic controls airspeed
for the most part, while the collective maintains altitude, When climbing
or descending, the cyclic maintains the airspeed of the helicopter while
the collective increases or decreases lift as required. Since an increase
or decrease in collective often corresponds with an increase or decrease in
throttle, the torque of the helicopter may increase or decrease during
altitude changes. This means the rudder pedals need to be adjusted
constantly to match the torque on the helicopter.
TAKE-OFF AND LANDING
Helicopter take-off usually consists of two manoevres - going into hover,
and forward, climbing flight. First, the pilot lifts off the ground
vertically using increased throttle and collective, maintaining horizontal
position as in a hover but adding more collective to pull the aircraft
upward. Then, the pilot pushes the cyclic forward and pulls up on the
collective to attain airspeed and climb to altitude.
Whenever possible, helicopter take-off should be done into the wind, to
prevent drift during take-off. The pilot should also pick some reference
point on the ground to keep his heading steady during the initial
acceleration.
Landing is essentially a reverse process - descending forward flight to a
point above the landing point, and a gradually descending hover to the
ground. All descent should be stopped when the helicopter goes into a
hover.
Page 107
The helicopter should not be allowed to drift horizontally while touching
down, as it could easily tip over. This could lead to the pilot and crew
eating pieces of shattered rotor blade. Also, it is important that the
collective be handled gently during landing, as too rapid a descent can
prove dangerous. At best, a very expensive aircraft is bounced off the
ground, and several vertebrae are compressed.
"STEPPING ON THE BRAKES"
There may be the occasion where it becomes necessary to rapidly slow down
horizontal flight - a large impassable object ahead, or some other
condition that might have a negative impact on the service life of the
helicopter. In such a situation, care should be taken by the pilot to
maintain altitude and avoid wild changes in heading. Coordinated,
simultaneous use of the controls is essential.
To "put on the brakes". the pilot lets down on the collective and pulls
back on the cyclic at the same time, while adjusting the rudder to prevent
a wild swing in heading. As the helicopter slows to the desired speed, the
pilot levels the craft by pushing forward again on the cyclic (to prevent
the helicopter from settling tail first and hitting the ground) and
adjusting the collective (to maintain altitude).
Page 108
------------------
HELICOPTER TACTICS
------------------
One of the great handicaps of helicopter combat is that there is nowhere to
hide in the sky. Anti-aircraft artillery (AAA), surface-to air missiles,
helicopters, and ground fire from small automatic weapons can swat a
helicopter from the sky. With a wide proliferation of man-portable,
high-tech weapons like the Stinger, SA-7 Grail, and SA-14 Gremlin missiles,
the open skies are an even more dangerous place for slow-flying helicopters
than before. To survive, the pilot must be able to use the unique flight
characteristics of the helicopter to his advantage.
One of the most commonLy used defensive manOevres fOr helicopters is
Nap-of-the-earth (NOE) flying. In thiS type of flying, the helicopter
follows the contour of the earth, in almost all respects becoming a ground
vehicle. This type of flying demands a great deal of skill. But if the
pilot doesn't hit a tree or hill, he gains a great deal more security on
the battlefield from SAMs and AAA. Exposure to fire from enemy units is
minimised because the helicopter is masked by the terrain for a majority of
its flight, and the helicopter gains a degree of surprise.
HELICOPTER Vs TANKS AND GROUND UNITS
The manoevreability of helicopters gives them the best of both worlds when
it comes to combat with ground forces; they can use the terrain to their
advantage, and then fly above it when it becomes an impediment. This
ability gives the helicopter gunship the ability to ambush enemy ground
forces whenever the terrain permits.
Page 109
Ambush tactics for gunships date back to the Vietnam war, when Huey Cobras
patrolled the Ho Chi Minh trail. The most common ambush manoevre is the
"pop-up" - the helicopter masks itself behind a tree line, house, or other
terrain feature, and then "pops-up" from behind its hiding place to deliver
the attack. The usual minimum number of helicopters for an ambush attack
is three, by NATO doctrine.
A "pop-up" is only necessary to use direct-fire weapons - weapons that
require a target to be in line of sight. With the Apache's Hellfire
laser-guided anti-tank missiles, the Apache does not even need to pop-up.
Another helicopter or a forward observer can designate the target with a
laser, and the Apache can fire from cover.
Another weapon that offers virtually no exposure time to enemy fire is the
sub-munition-type anti-armour system attack. This attack relies on a
pattern of multi-purpose bomblets from exploding unguided rockets. The
helicopter makes its approach shielded by the terrain, then pulls up and
fires, and turns toward the rear, immediately returning to NOE flight to
avoid enemy fire.
HELICOPTER Vs HELICOPTER
The first all-heLicOpter dOgfight oN record occured during the Iran-Iraq
war, when an Iraqi Hind Shot down an Iranian Cobra. Even before this
event, it was widely assumed that in any large-scale conflict of the
future, helicopters would meet each other in combat. The Soviets have even
designed a helicopter for the single purpose of air-to-air combat
operations (the Hokum).
Helicopter-to-helicopter combat tactics are an evolution of the combat
tactics used by fighter pilots in WWI. The unique manoevring abilities of
the helicopter add some considerations to the equation, but the old
problems are essentially the same - how to convert velocity and altitude
into a shooting position.
Pages 110-111
If approached from behind, the first instinct of many helicopter pilots is
to brake hard to force the enemy to overshoot. To recover from an
overshoot, helicopter pilots have developed a manoevre known as the "High
Yo Yo". When the target brakes, the attacker pulls up hard to avoid an
overshoot converting airspeed into altitude, and then manoevres to the
"six-o'-clock" position (directly behind the target) and drops down for the
attack.
Rather than braking hard, a pilot finding himself in front of an oncoming
attacker might execute a maneuvre called the "Horizontal Scissors". In
this maneuvre, the pilot turns hard to one side and reduces forward
velocity. The attacker is forced to turn to follow, and the pilot then
turns hard in the opposite direction. The attacker is forced to reverse
his turn and is forced out in front of the defender, who is now in a
position to take a shot.
When faced with an attacker in close proximity, a helicopter pilot can use
a maneuvre developed by the U.S. Marines known as the "Side Flare Quick
Stop". The pilot pulls up hard and flares to one side, forcing the
attacker to overshoot. Now behind the opponent,the pilot dives down to the
six-o-clock position and has the enemy in his sights.
When meeting an adversary from an opposite direction, a pilot can use a
maneuvre known as a "Stern Conversion". The pilot accelerates and performs
a hard, banking turn called a "Wing-Over"(similar to the maneuvre used in
WWII movies by pilots turning out of formation for an attack run). The
pilot then performs a turning dive into attack position behind the enemy
aircraft.
As of yet, these tactics are fairly theoretical - none have been truly
proven in combat. But it is clear that pilots will use some derivative of
them in any future conflict where helicopters meet over the battlefield.
PAGE 114-115
----------------------------
4 EQUIPMENT AND ORGANISATION
----------------------------
DATA FORMAT
-----------
LENGTH, WIDTH, HEIGHT, WEIGHT AND DIAMETER
All are expressed in metric measurements. Metric measures are used because
most armies, including the U.S. Army, utilise the metric system. Vehicles
list fully loaded combat weights. Aircraft list maximum take - off
weights.
CREW/PASS
The "crew" is the normal fighting compliment of the vehicle or aircraft-
the men who remain aboard in combat situations
While most all vehicles can carry passengers in one form or another,only
those who are specifically built for transport,or provide a modicom of
cover,list passengers. The "passengers" frequently dismount in combat.
ENGINE
The horsepower (hp) and type of the main engine(s). Helicopter engines are
rated in "shaft horsepower"(shp). Fixed wing aircraft engines are rated in
pounds of statistic thrust" (lb st). "AB" indicates afterburner
capability.
MAX SPEED
For vehicles, this is maximum rated road speed in kilometres per hour
(kph). For aircraft and ships, this is the maximum level speed in knots
(kts) at sea level.
RATE OF CLIMB
For helicopters, this is the vertical rate of climb from hover in feet per
second (ft/sec). In most cases, the maximum rate of climb is about twice
this value.
SERVICE CEILING
The maximum altitude obtainable with a nominal weapon load. The Rules Of
Engagement (ROE) for a Theatre of Operations (TO) normally limit the
maximum altitude to a much lower value.
MAIN GUN
The size and type of main gun, if any. All guns are rifled, unless "SB"
(Smooth Bore) is indicated. For guns other than machine guns (MG), the
number of rounds carried (rds) is also indicated.
MISSILES
The name and type of missile carried. Aircraft and ships will also list
the predominate non-missile weapons. Please note that other weapon systems
could also be carried.
WEAPON LOAD
For aircraft, this is the maximum weapon load. More often than not,
aircraft fly with less than their rated maximum load.
PAGE 116
Many vehicles mount one or more secondary weapons, usually machine guns for
local ground and air defence.
Vehicle armour thickness is expressed as Heavy, Medium, Light, or None.
SOVIET NAMES
You may wonder where the Soviets came up with all those weird names? Well,
the names listed for most of the Soviet equipment are in reality NATO
designations, not the real Soviet names. These NATO designations utilise
the first letter of the unit`s type to formulate the name. That`s why the
Soviet fighter aircraft have names beginning with an "F", helicopters with
an "H", air-to air missiles with an "A" and so on.
The reason is twofold. First of all, the Russian language is not that easy
to read or pronounce; secondly, the actual names are sometimes not known
until years after the unit has been spotted or released - after all, you
have to call it something.
PAGE 117
-----------------------------------
YOUR HELICOPTERS AND WEAPON SYSTEMS
-----------------------------------
AH-64A APACHE GUNSHIP
In the mid-1960s, after the AH-56 Cheyenne failed to meet required
developmental specifications (too expensive and too complex), the US Army
was left without an advanced attack helicopter. At that time,the AH-1
Cobra was considered to be only a short-term step. The search continued,
and the contract for the Apache was finally awarded in 1976; the first
Apache entered service in 1986. The Apache is now considered to be the
premier helicopter gunship.
AVIONICS:Includes a full suite of advanced communication systems,
navigational flight aids and survivability systems. The target
acquisition/designation sight and pilots night vision sensor (TADS/PNVS)
are the heart of the avionics package. These linked systems include an
auto-focus thermal imager, laser ranger/designator and TV camera. Both are
integrated into a helmet-mounted sighting system. IR signature is reduced
by the Black Hole system. An airborne target handoff subsystem (ATHS) data
link is also included.
WEIGHT: 9.5 tons MAX SPEED: 160 kts
CREW/PASS: 2/0 RATE OF CLIMB: 42ft/sec
LENGTH: 17.8m SERVICE CEILING: 21,000ft
WIDTH: 5.3m MAIN GUN: 30mm,1200rds
HEIGHT: 4.7m MISSILES: Hellfire ATGM,Rockets
ROTOR DIAM: 14.6m WEAPON LOAD: 3.5 tons
ENGINE: two 1,696 shp
PAGE 118
AH-64B LONGBOW APACHE GUNSHIP
A natural follow-on to the AH 64A, the longbow Apache will feature a number
of mid-life product improvements, but will be built around the new
millimetre-wave radar guided Hellfire weapon system. This system includes
an intergrated mast-mounted sight. The MMW Hellfire is a true "Fire and
Forget" weapon.It`s seeker head will guide itself to the target; a target
designator is not required. It`s also longer ranged and suffers less
degradation from rain, fog and smoke than FLIR`s and thermal imagers.
These upgrades will make the Longbow Apache and the Comanche unbeatable
stablemates.
AVIONICS: Will be an upgrade to current Apache systems, but changes will
mainly involve the target type discriminating MMW systems and related
subsystems.
WEIGHT: 9.7tons MAX. SPEED: 160 kts
CREW/PASS: 2/0 RATE OF CLIMB: 40 ft?sec
LENGTH 17.8 SERVICE CEILING: 21000ft
WIDTH 5.3m MAIN GUN: 30mm,12000rds
HEIGHT: 5.6m MISSILES: MMW Hellfire ATGM,
Rockets
ROTOR DIAM: 14.6m
ENGINE: two 1,696 shp WEAPON LOAD 3.5 tons
AH-1W SUPERCOBRA GUNSHIP
The first UH-1 Cobra was built from the UH-1 Huey airframe and saw combat
in Vietnam. The cobra has gone through many modifications and model
changes. The "W" model is the latest Supercobra iteration (it became known
as the supercobra on or about the "S" model). While it`s currently only
fielded by the US Marines, the US Army is soon expected to upgrade to "W"
standards
AVIONICS: Includes a full suite of communication systems, navigational
flight aids and survivability systems. The nose-mounted night targeting
system (NTS) includes a FLIR, laser ranger/designator and TOW fire
controls. This is intergrated with the helmet-mounted sighting system. An
airborne target handoff subsystem (ATHS) data link is also included.
WEIGHT: 7.6 tons MAX SPEED: 170 kts
CREW/PASS: 2/0 RATE OF CLIMB: 45ft/sec
LENGTH: 17.7m SERVICE CEILING: 14,000ft
WIDTH: 3.3m MAIN GUN: 20mm,750rds
HEIGHT: 4.3m MISSILES: Hellfire and TOW
ATGM,Rockets
ROTOR DIAM: 14.6m
ENGINE: two 1,690shp WEAPON LOAD: 1.4 tons
PAGE 119
AH-66A COMANCHE GUNSHIP/SCOUT HELICOPTER
In 1982 the US Army invited manufacturers to submit design concepts for
it`s Light Helicopter Experiment (LHX) programme. The origional
procurement called for 5,000 units to replace UH-1,AH-1,OH-58, and OH-6
airframes; this was later revised to 2,096 units (the UH-1 Huey follow-on
was eliminated). The LHX, now designated the AH-A Comanche, will feature
many advances in helicopter technology, including all-composite airframe
construction, advanced bearingless rotor system, internal weapons bay and
retractable landing gear. Stealth technologies will be employed where
feasible. It`s tandem cockpit seats the pilot in the front seat, as in jet
aircraft.
AVIONICS: Includes the most advanced systems to date. All will be
fly-by-wire technology. All systems are integrated into the wide
Field-of-View helmet sighting/targeting system. MFD`s will dominate the
console, and the architecture will be of the same generation as US
Airforce`s Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF).
WEIGHT: 7.5 tons MAX SPEED: 170kts
CREW/PASS 2/0 RATE OF CLIMB: 40ft/sec
LENGTH: 13.2m SERVICE CEILING: 15,000ft
WIDTH: 2.3m MAIN GUN: 20mm,500rds
HEIGHT: 3.4m MISSILES: Hellfire ATGM,
Rockets,Stinger
ROTOR DIAM: 11.9m
ENGINE: two 1,200shp WEAPON LOAD: 2.5 tons
PAGE 121
OH-58D KIOWA WARRIOR SCOUT HELICOPTER
The first OH-58`s saw service in the Vietnam war. It had been selected as
the replacement for the OH-6 Cayuse. It also has seen great commercial
success as thr Jet Ranger. The Kiowa Warrior is to be only the near-term
scout helicopter. It`s scheduled to be replaced in the mid-1990`s by the
AH-66A Comanche. The US Army plans to field a total of 477 OH-58D`s, by
upgrading OH-58A models to OH-58D standards.
AVIONICS: Mast-mounted sight includes auto-focus thermal imager, laser
ranger/designator and TV camera. The airborne target handoff subsystem
(ATHS) enables remote targeting for the Hellfire misile.
WEIGHT: 2.0 tons MAX SPEED: 120kts
CREW/PASS: 2/0 RATE OF CLIMB: 20ft/sec
LENGTH: 12.9m SERVICE CEILING: 12,000ft
WIDTH: 2.0m MAIN GUN: None
HEIGHT: 3.9m MISSILES: Hellfire ATGM,
Rockets,Stinger
ROTOR DIAM: 10.7m
ENGINE: one 650 shp WEAPON LOAD: .4tons
PAGE 121
UH-60K/L BLACKHAWK ASSAULT HELICOPTER
As a replacement for the UH-1 Iroquois Transport Helicopter (the famous
Huey), the Blackhawk entered service in 1979. Designed primarily to
transport 11 fully equipped troops, it`s spacious cabin enables it also to
be used, without modification , for medevac, supply and command functions.
The external stores support system (ESSS) can carry a significant number of
weapons. The "K" and "L" models entered service in 1988.
AVIONICS: Includes a full suite of communication systems, navigational
flight aids, including the advanced AFCS subsystem, and survivability
systems. UHF satellite communication is also available. IR signature is
supressed by the hover infrared suppressor (HISS) system.
WEIGHT: 10.0 tons MAX SPEED: 160kts
CREW/PASS: 3/11 RATE OF CLIMB: 32ft/sec
LENGTH: 17,7m SERVICE CEILING: 19,000ft
WIDTH: 5.5m MAIN GUN: None
HEIGHT 5.1m MISSILES: Hellfire ATGM,
Rockets,Gun Pods
ROTOR DIAM: 16.4m
ENGINE: two 1,560shp WEAPON LOAD: 4.6tons
PAGE 121
AH-6G DEFENDER LIGHT GUNSHIP/SCOUT HELICOPTER
The original Defender dates back to the Vietnam war, where it saw action as
the OH-6A Cayuse LOH (Light Observation Helicopter-"Loach:). The AH-6G is
based on the commercial MD530 helicopter. A compact integrated crew
station with multiple MFD`s enhances this helicopter`s field of view. It`s
designed primarily for day or night point attack and anti-armour missions,
but is equally suitable for scout missions.
AVIONICS: Includes a full suite of communications systems, navigational
flight aids and survivability systems. Mast-mounted sight includes FLIR,
laser ranger and TOW fire controls.
WEIGHT: 1.4 tons MAX SPEED: 120kts
CREW/PASS: 2/3 RATE OF CLIMB: 28ft/sec
LENGTH: 9.8m SERVICE CEILING: 16,000ft
WIDTH: 3.2m MAIN GUN: 7.62mm MG
HEIGHT: 3.0m MISSILES: TOW,ATGM,
Rockets
ROTOR DIAM: 8.3m
ENGINE: One 650shp WEAPON LOAD: 7 tons
PAGE 122
M230 30MM CHAINGUN
Primary armament on the Apaches. The chaingun is a single barrelled,
externally powered weapon that`s driven by a simple chain mechanism. The
chain literally pulls the rounds of ammunition through the gun, therefore
greatly reducing the chance of a jam. The chaingun configuration is
lighter than gatling guns.
WEIGHT: 55.9kg RATE OF FIRE: 625rpm ^ 9
AIMING MECHANISM: Helmet mounted sight, or gunner`s sight.
PRIMARY TARGET: Medium armoured or unprotected targets
PAGE 123
M197 20MM GATLING GUN
Primary armament on the SuperCobra. The M197 is a lightweight externally
powered 3-barrelled version of the M61A1 Vulcan 6-barrelled fighter
aircraft weapon. It uses the gatling gun principal of rotating barrels
around a common axis. This makes for a high rate of fire and limits
jamming.
WEIGHT: 66kg RATE OF FIRE: 3,000rpm
AIMING MECHANISM: Helmet mounted sight or gunner`s sight.
PRIMARY TARGET: Lightly armoured or unprotected targets
SUU-11B/A MINIGUN POD
The minigun is a 7.62mm development of the M61A1 20mm Vulcan 6-barrelled
gatling gun. It`s available as a wing-mounted pod weapon on the Blackhawk,
the SuperCobra Kiowa Warrior or Defender, and it`s also the fixed gun
weapon on the defender. It provides excellent area suppressive fire for a
small cost in weight.
WEIGHT: 147kg with 1,500 rds RATE OF FIRE: 2,000/4,000rpm
AIMING MECHANISM: Direct fire along axis of flight.
PRIMARY TARGET: Unprotected targets.
PAGE 125
GPU-2/A GUN POD
The GPU-2/A is basically a M197 20mm 3-barrelled gatling gun in pod form.
It`s a totally self contained unit with gun and ammunition. It even has
it`s own rechargable power scource. All the pilot has to do is aim and
fire. It`s available as a wing-mounted pod weapon on the Blackhawk,
SuperCobra, Kiowa Warrior or Defender
WEIGHT: 270kg with 300rds RATE OF FIRE: 1,500 rpm
AIMING MECHANISM: Direct fire along axis of flight.
PRIMARY TARGET: Lightly armoured or unprotected targets.
VIPER 20MM GATLING GUN
Primary armament on the Comanche. The viper is a lightweight 2-Barrelled
cannon. It uses an all new configuration, but is still based on the
gatling gun principal of rotating barrels around a common axis. It`s
speculated that it fires a more effective round of ammunition than the
standard M197 20mm cannon round.
WEIGHT: 50kg RATE OF FIRE: 2,00rpm
AIMING MECHANISM: Helmet mounted sight.
PRIMARY TARGET: Lightly armoured or unprotected targets.
AIM 92 STINGER AM
The air launched version of the Stinger has been in operation since 1988.
Based on the excellent man-made portable system, this system combines a new
dual colour IR and UV seeker head and a reprogrammable microprocessor
(RPM). The missiles are mounted in a twin missile pod system. The Stinger
is a very efficient lightweight missile.
WEIGHT: 47kg twin launcher MAXIMUM FIRING RANGE: Under 10 km
GUIDANCE SYSTEM: IR Homing
PRIMARY TARGET: Short range, low-flying targets.
PAGE 125
AIM-9R SIDEWINDER AAM
The Sidewinder dates back to the late 1940`s when it was fist developed by
the US Navy. The current model bears little resemblance to the original
other than in outward appearance. It has gone through innumerable changes
in it`s lifetime. The "R" model has an all-aspect seeker head and improved
low-smoke rocket engine.
WEIGHT: 87kg MAXIMUM FIRING RANGE: 18km
GUIDANCE SYSTEM: Passive radar homing.
PRIMARY TARGET: All airborne targets.
AGM-122 SIDEARM AGM
The Sidearm system evolved out of the need to develop a low-cost,
lightweight anti-radar missile . Unused Sidewinder AIM-9C`s were
refurbished and brought up to AIM-9L/M standards,and a broadband passive
radar seeker replaced the existing seeker. It will be carried by AV-8B
Harriers,F-4GPhantom Wild Weasels, and helicopters.
WEIGHT: 91KG MAXIMUM FIRING RANGE: 15km
GUIDANCE SYSTEM: Passive radar homing.
PRIMARY TARGET: SAM and gun control radars
PAGE 126
AGM-65D MAVERICK AGM
The Maverick "D" model entered service in 1983 and was a natural follow-on
to this very succesful weapon. It has replaced the earlier "TV" guidance
system with an imaging infrared system. The IR system has a much greater
range and has ability to "see" through smoke and dust. Maverick is a true
fire-and-forget weapon system.
WEIGHT: 220kg MAXIMUM FIRING RANGE: 25km
GUIDANCE SYSTEM: IR Homing.
PRIMARY TARGET: Heavily armoured targets and fortifications.
AGM-114A/B HELLFIRE AGM
Hellfire is the US Army`s latest anti-armour weapon system. The "A"
model`s laser seeker requires the target to be illuminated by a laser
scource; however it need not be the launching helicopter. The "B" model`s
millimetre wave radar seeker is a true fire-and-forget weapon system. It
will be carried by the Longbow Apache.
WEIGHT: 43kg MAXIMUM FIRING RANGE: 6km(A),8km(B)
GUIDANCE SYSTEM: Semi-active laser (A), MMW Radar (B).
PRIMARY TARGET: Heavily armoured targets and fortifications.
BGM-71D TOW-2 AGM
The TOW system has been utilised as an airborne ATGM since the Vietnam war.
It uses semi-automatic command to line of sight (SACLOS) guidance. All the
operator has to do is keep the cross-hairs centred on the target. Commands
are transmitted on the TOW via a thin wire. The TOW-2 model has a larger,
improved warhead.
WEIGHT: 22kg MAXIMUM FIRING RANGE: 4km
GUIDANCE SYSTEM: Command to Line-of-Sight via Wire
PRIMARY TARGET: Heavily armoured targets and fortifications.
PAGE 127
HELSTREAK HVM AGM/AAM
The Helstreak High Velocity Missile (HVM) system is based on the British
Starstreak SAM. It`s laser guided warhead contains three highly accurate
darts that independently home in on the target. This makes for a high
coverage pattern, which is important in the air to air role. With HVMs,
exposure time is reduced.
WEIGHT: 40kg MAXIMUM FIRING RANGE: 7km
GUIDANCE SYSTEM: Semi-active laser homing.
PRIMARY TARGET: Medium armoured ground and air targets.
PENGUIN-3 ANTI-SHIP MISSILE
The Norwegian developed Penguin-3 anti-ship missile`s modest weight (as far
as ship missiles go) makes it ideally suited for helicopters. The missile
is aimed at a point on the surface, and it flies there under it`s own
inertial guidance. Then, it switches on it`s IR homer, seeking out the
heat of the ship against the cool ocean background.
WEIGHT: 380kg MAXIMUM FIRING RANGE: 40km
GUIDANCE SYSTEM: IR Homing.
PRIMARY TARGET: Medium and light ships.
PAGE 128
HYDRA 70 ROCKET SYSTEM
The Hydra 70 rocket system (the 70=70mm, or 2,75 in.) is a series of
rockets each with a special purpose warhead. The M261 has a sub-munition
multipurpose warhead. The M247 has a shaped-charge warhead for use against
armoured targets. The M255 has a flechette warhead for use against
unarmoured targets or helicopters
WEIGHT: 9kg MAXIMUM FIRING RANGE: 2-3km
GUIDING SYSTEM: Unguided.
PRIMARY TARGET: Varies by warhead type.
PAGE 129
------------------------
THE GROUND AND AIR UNITS
------------------------
U.S. AND ALLIED UNITS
The friendlies are not so friendlies. These are the predominate vehicles,
aircraft and ships you`ll cross paths with throughout your missions. While
you`ll certainly come across many other units (e.g. trains, trucks,
buildings, bridges, oil tanks and airfields), they`re just too numerous to
mention
M1A1 "ABRAMS" MAIN BATTLE TANK
Unquestionably the finest in the field today, the M1A1 entered the service
in 1985. It mounts the hard-hitting German Rheinmetall 120mm smoothbore
cannon (same as the German Leopard 2) backed by a sophisticated fire
control system. Later version have depleted uranium (DU) armour added to
the turret and hull fronts.
WEIGHT: A57.2 tons MAIN GUN: 120mm SB, 40rds
CREW/PASS: 4/0 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 1,500hp turbine SEC. GUN: Three MGs
SPEED: 64kph ARMOUR: Heavy
M60A3 MAIN BATTLE TANK
The M603A lineage dates from the venerable M47s and M48s. An earlier
model, the M60A1, saw great success in the hands of the Israelis. It`s
slow and tall by today`s standards (not a good combination), but still
possesses reasonably good armour and firepower. It`s also fielded by Saudi
Arabia and Egypt.
WEIGHT: 52.6tons MAIN GUN: 105mm,63rds
CREW/PASS: 4/2 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 750hp diesel SEC GUN: two MGs
SPEED: 48kph ARMOUR: Heavy
Page 130
CHALLENGER MAIN BATTLE TANK
The British began design work on a replacement for the Cheiftin in the late
60's. The final concept took a roundabout route, as the Challenger is
essentially the Iranian Shir-2. It was designed by the British, for, at
that time, the Shah led Iran., but the Ayatollah had a different opinion
about buying tanks from the British.
WEIGHT 62 tons MAIN GUN 120mm, 64rds
CREW/PASS 4/0 MISSILES None
ENGINE 1,200 hp diesel SECGUN Two MG's
MAX SPEED 56kph ARMOUR Heavy
AMX-30 MAIN BATTLE TANK
A French design, the AMX-30 entered production in 1966. Emphasising the
predominate European theories of the time, its design embraces speed and
firepower, as armour was considered a secondary factor. The AMX-30 is also
fielded by a number of middle eastern nations including Saudi Arabia and
Qatar.
WEIGHT: 36 tons MAIN GUN: 105mm, 47rds
CREW/PASS: 4/0 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 720 hp multi-fuel SEC GUN: One cannon, one MG
MAX SPEED: 65 kph ARMOUR: Medium
M2A1 "BRADLEY" INFANTRY FIGHTING VEHICLE
The first Bradleys entered active service in 1983 after a protracted
developmental period; the need was first identified in 1963. Its 25mm
"Bushmaster" chaingun (a relative of the 30mm chaingun mounted on the AH-64
Apache) fires highly effective depleted uranium shells; TOW ATGM's provide
the long-range hitting power.
WEIGHT: 22.6 tons MAIN GUN: 25mm, 900rds
CREW/PASS: 3/7 MISSILES: TOW-2, 7rds
ENGINE: 500 hp diesel SEC GUN: One MG
SPEED: 66 kph ARMOUR: Light
PAGE 131
WARRIOR MECHANISED COMBAT VEHICLE
In the 1970s the Brit's embarked on a programme to develop a mechanised
combat vehicle. Somewhat austere by US standards, the Warrior lacks long
range missile capability, and has relatively simple fire control systems.
But it's relatively inexpensive, and quite sound mechanically, The Warrior
entered service in 1987.
WEIGHT: 24.5 tons MAIN GUN: 30mm, 228 rds
CREW/PASS: 3/7 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 550 hp diesel SEC GUN: one MG
MAX SPEED: 72 kph ARMOUR: Light
M113A3 ARMOURED PERSONNEL CARRIER
The proLific M113 series was Originally designed in 1956, and entered
service in 1960. The A3 versiON entered production in 1987. The M113 iS a
"battle-taxi", designed to only transport the infantry into the general
vicinity of the battle. Over 75,000 have been produced. It's used by many
middle eastern nations.
WEIGHT: 12.1 tons MAIN GUN: 12.7mm MG
CREW/PASS: 2/10 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 275 hp diesel SEC GUN: None
SPEED: 64 kph ARMOUR: Light
PAGE 132
SCORPION RECONNAISSANCE VEHICLE
Born out of British study conducted in the 1950s, the Scorpion entered
British service in 1972. Its excellent cross-country performance and high
speed make for the ideal recon vehicle. The Scorpion's basic design has
spawned 7 follow-on vehicles. It's also fielded by Saudi Arabia, UAE and
Oman.
WEIGHT: 8.1 tons MAIN GUN: 76mm, 40rds
CREW/PASS: 3/0 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 190 hp petrol SEC GUN: one MG
MAX SPEED: 81 kph ARMOUR: Light
SCIMITAR RECONNAISSANCE VEHICLE
A descendant of the Scorpion, the Scimitar followed it into service one
year later. The two vehicles differ primarily only in their armament. The
scimitar is intended to provide area suppressive fire, while still having
the penetrative power to engage opposing recon and light vehicles
WEIGHT: 7.8 tons MAIN GUN: 30mm, 165 rds
CREW/PASS: 3/0 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 190 hp petrol SEC GUN: one MG
MAX SPEED: 81 kph ARMOUR: Light
M901A2 ITV ANTI-TANK VEHICLE
The ITV (Improved TOW Vehicle) entered service in 1979 as a replacement for
the M150 open-topped TOW vehicle. It's a M113A2 fitted with the Emerson
M27 TOW cupola. The M27 mounts a twin launcher, TOW guidance systems and a
thermal imager. The TOW's can be fired and reloaded from "under armour".
WEIGHT: 13.0 tons MAIN GUN: None
CREW/PASS: 4/0 MISSILES: TOW-2, 12 rds
ENGINE: 215 hp diesel SEC GUN: one MG
SPEED: 55 kph ARMOUR: Light
PAGE 133
M163A2 PIVADS SELF-PROPELLED ANTI-AIRCRAFT GUN
The M163 entered service in 1968; the PIVADS (Product Improved Vulcan Air
Defence System) came on to the scene in 1984. The system is an M113A1
chassis with a one-man electrically-driven turret. The 20mm gatling gun is
the same as used by Air Force Fighters. Even with its high rate of fire,
it's very limited.
WEIGHT: 12.3 tons MAIN GUN: 20mm, 2100 rds
CREW/PASS: 4/0 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 215 hp diesel SEC GUN: None
SPEED: 68 kph ARMOUR: Light
M998 "HUMMER" UTILITY VEHICLE
The multi-purpose "Hummer" entered service as a replacement for the famous
and ubiquitous Jeep (M151). The Hummer fulfills many roles, serving as an
APC, Scout, TOW platform and fire support vehicle. To date, over 100,000
have been ordered for various branches of the US Armed Forces.
WEIGHT: 2.3 tons MAIN GUN: 12.7mm MG
CREW/PASS: 2/4 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 132 hp diesel SEC GUN: None
MAX SPEED: 105 kph ARMOUR: None
PAGE 134
M109A3 SELF-PROPELLED ARTILLERY VEHICLE
The M109 concept dates back to 1952, when it was born out of a study on
self-propelled artillery. The lessons learned in WW2 and Korea clearly
spelled the ultimate demise of static arillery. The M109 series emerged as
the standard by which all other "SP's" are judged. It's fielded by most
NATO members and many other nations.
WEIGHT: 24.9 tons MAIN GUN: 155mm, 36 rds
CREW/PASS: 6/0 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 405 hp diesel SEC GUN: None
MAX SPEED: 56 kph ARMOUR: Light
MRLS ROCKET LAUNCHER
An international design/production programme, the MRLS (Multiple Rocket
Launch System) entered service in 1983. The vehicle is partially based on
the M2 Bradley chasis. Its primary rocket is the M77 rocket; each warhead
contains 644 dual purpose shaped-charge fragmentation bomlets.
WEIGHT: 25.2 tons MAIN GUN: None
CREW/PASS: 3/0 MISSILES: 12-227mm rockets
ENGINE: 500 hp diesel SEC GUN: None
MAX SPEED: 64 kph ARMOUR: Light
PAGE 135
LHA TARAWA CLASS AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT SHIP
The first ship of this class has been in service since 1976. The LHA's are
intended to combine the capabilities of LPH (helicopter carriers) and LPD
(amphibious docks) into one ship. Four landing craft are carried in its
deck. Its boilers are the largest ever installed on a US ship. It has a
complete 300 bed hospital.
WEIGHT: 39,400 tons MAIN GUN: 3x127mm
CREW/PASS: 1014/1924 MISSILES: Sea Sparrow SAM
ENGINE: 70,000 hp AIRCRAFT: 38 helicopters
MAX SPEED: 24 kts or 20 AV-8/B Harriers
FF KNOX CLASS FRIGATE
The Knox Class is typical of the many escort frigates built during the
1970s. The class packs a large amount of firepower onto a small frame.
The Harpoon SSM's are fired from the forward mounted ASROC launcher. The
originally fitted Sea Sparrow SAM system, are being replaced by the
Vulcan/Phalanx 20mm system.
WEIGHT: 4,250 tons MAIN GUN: 1x127mm
CREW/PASS: 275/0 MISSILES: Harpoon SSM,
ASDRC anti-sub
ENGINE: 35,000 hp
MAX SPEED: 27 + kts AIRCRAFT: 1 helicopter The Op
PAGE 136
THE OPPOSING FORCES
-------------------
T-80A MAIN BATTLE TANK
The Soviet T-80A is thought to have entered service in 1983. It has closer
development ties to the T-64 then to the T-72. It's considered to be only
an evolutionary design, although the gas turbine-engine is a radical
departure. The AT-8 Songster was added to provide long range capability as
the 125mm SB's accuracy is poor.
WEIGHT: 42 tons MAIN GUN: 125mm SB, 42 rds
CREW/PASS: 3/0 MISSILES: Songster, 2 rds
ENGINE: 980 hp turbine SEC GUN: two MG's
SPEED: 75 kph ARMOUR: Heavy
T-64B MAIN BATTLE TANK
The original Soviet T-64's entered service in 1967, and were plagued with
autoloader and engine problems. The "B" model seems to have corrected
these problems since it's still in production. It appears the T-64's were
the "high-tech" option while the t-72's embodied the "bargain-basement"
approach. The T-64 has never been exported.
WEIGHT: 42 tons MAIN GUN: 125mm SB, 42 rds
CREW/PASS: 3/0 MISSILES: Songster, 2 rds
ENGINE: 750 hp diesel SEC GUN: two MG's
SPEED: 75 kph ARMOUR: Heavy
PAGE 137
T-72M1 MAINS BATTLE TANK
The T-72 followed shortly after the T-64, entering service in 1971. The
T-72 series has had a long career, and has been exported to many nations.
Over a dozen sub-models have been identified to date. This model features
enhanced turret armour, resulting in the nickname "Dolly Parton". It's
also fielded by Iraq, Syria and Kuwait.
WEIGHT: 41 tons MAIN GUN: 125mm SB 39 rds
CREW/PASS: 3/0 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 780 hp diesel SEC GUN: two MG's
SPEED: 80 kph ARMOUR: Heavy
T-62E MAIN BATTLE TANK
The Soviet T-62 was developed from the earlier T-54/T-55 series, and
entered service in the early 1960's. It was the first tank to mount a
smoothbore gun. Its low ballistic shape was a plus, but otherwise it was
mediocre. The "E" model features add-on "horseshoe" turret armour and a
laser sight. It's also fielded by Egypt, Syria and Iraq.
WEIGHT: 41.1 tons MAIN GUN: 115mm SB, 40 rds
CREW/PASS: 4/0 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 580 hp diesel SEC GUN: two MG's
SPEED: 50 kph ARMOUR: Heavy
PAGE 138
T-55M1 MAIN BATTLE TANK
The latest version of the Soviet T-55 (the first entered service in the
late 1950s) features add-on "horseshoe" turret armour and a laser sight.
This is your basic "no frills" tank; simplicity is king here. The
T-54/T-55's are the most widely exported of all Soviet MBT's and is fielded
by over 40 nations including Egypt, Syria and Iraq.
WEIGHT: 37.0 tons MAIN GUN: 100mm, 43 rds
CREW/PASS: 4/0 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 580 hp diesel SEC GUN: two MG's
SPEED: 50 kph ARMOUR: Heavy
CHIEFTAIN MAIN BATTLE TANK
The British designed Chieftain introduced a number of innovations when it
appeared in 1963. It was the first tank to mount a 120mm gun, and its
highly sloped armour provided then unheard of protection. Yet still, it's
slow and relatively clumsy. Iraq does field a large force, but acquired
them as war booty from Iran and Kuwait.
WEIGHT: 55 tons MAIN GUN: 120mm, 64 rds
CREW/PASS: 4/0 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 750 hp multi-fuel SEC GUN: three MG's
SPEED: 48 kph ARMOUR: Heavy
PAGE 139
BMP-2 INFANTRY FIGHTING VEHICLE
The BMP-2 is an upgrade of the Soviet BMP-1, and probably entered service
around 1980. It saw the poor 73mm gun replaced with a high-velocity 30mm
auto-cannon. The commander was moved from the hull to the turret,
improving labour distribution and vision. The Sagger was replaced with the
longer-ranged Spandrel.
WEIGHT: 14.6 tons MAIN GUN: 30mm, 500 rds
CREW/PASS: 3/7 MISSILES: Spandrel, 5 rds
ENGINE: 400 hp diesel SEC GUN: one MG
SPEED: 65 kph ARMOUR: Light
BMP-1 INFANTRY FIGHTING VEHICLE
The Soviet BMP-1 caused quite a stir when it entered service in 1967. This
revolutionary design was the first to combine cannon, ATGM and a full
infantry squad with under armour fire capability. Its 73mm gun has poor
long range accuracy, and the one-man turret is inefficient. It's also
fielded by Egypt, Syria and Iraq.
WEIGHT: 13.9 tons MAIN GUN: 73mm SB, 40 rds
CREW/PASS: 3/8 MISSILES: Sagger, 5 rds
ENGINE: 300 hp diesel SEC GUN: one MG
SPEED: 70 kph ARMOUR: Light
BTR-60/70/80 ARMOURED PERSONNEL CARRIER
The first version of this Soviet APC, the BTR-60, entered service in 1960s.
These vehicles are rather mediocre in all respects. The later models did
overcome a number of flaws; at least the BTR-80 (data is for this vehicle)
did replace the volatile petrol engines. The BTR-60 is fielded by most of
the middle eastern nations.
PAGE 140
WEIGHT: 10.5 tons MAIN GUN: 14.5mm, 500 rds
CREW/PASS: 2/12 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 260 hp diesel SEC GUN: one MG
SPEED: 80 kph ARMOUR: Light
MT-LB ARMOURED PERSONNEL CARRIER
The Soviet MT-LB design closely followed the MT-L arctic tractor. This
accounts for its excellent cross-country performance. Typical roles for
the MT-LB include artillery prime mover, command post and cargo carrier.
Its chasis is also the basis for a number of other vehicles.
WEIGHT: 9.7 tons MAIN GUN: 7.62mm MG
CREW/PASS: 2/10 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 240 hp diesel SEC GUN: None
SPEED: 62 kph ARMOUR: Light
EE-11 URUTU ARMOURED PERSONNEL CARRIER
The Brazilian EE-11 first entered service in 1974. By all measures, it's
non-descript, basic every day APC. Even its wheeled configuration is much
easier to maintain than a tracked arrangement. Like its cousin, the Ee-9,
it has been exported to many nations including Iraq.
WEIGHT: 14 tons MAIN GUN: 12.7mm MG
CREW/PASS: 2/11 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 260 hp diesel SEC GUN: None
SPEED: 105 kph ARMOUR: Light
PAGE 141
BRDM-2 RECONNAISSANCE VEHICLE
The Soviet BRDM-2 replaced its predecessor, the BRDM-1 in the mid-1960s.
its also used as a command or an observer vehicle. It has become
outclassed by more modern vehicles, and its 14.5mm gun is outdated and
inadequate. It's also fielded by most of the middle eastern nations.
WEIGHT: 7.0 tons MAIN GUN: 14.5mm, 500 rds
CREW/PASS: 2/3 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 140 hp petrol SEC GUN: one MG
SPEED: 100 kph ARMOUR: Light
AML-90 RECONNAISSANCE VEHICLE
The French ordered the construction of this light recon vehicle after their
successful use of the British Ferret scout car in North Africa; the AML-90
entered service in 1961. Over 5,000 AML's have been built to date in many
configurations. It's fielded by Saudi Arabia, UAE and Iraq.
WEIGHT: 5.5 tons MAIN GUN: 90mm, 20 rds
CREW/PASS: 3/0 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: A90 hp petrol SEC GUN: one MG
SPEED: 90 kph ARMOUR: Light
EE-9 CASCAVEL RECONNAISSANCE VEHICLE
Of Brazilian design, the Ee-9 entered service in 1974. It shares many
automotive components with the EE-11 APC. It now mounts a 90mm gun of
Brazilian design; earlier models had 37mm guns from WW2 vintage US M3
Stuart tanks. It's very simple yet robust, and this has made it a popular
export. It's fielded by Iraq.
PAGE 142
WEIGHT: 13.4 tons MAIN GUN: 90mm, 44rds
CREW/PASS: 3/0 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 212 hp diesel SEC GUN: two MG's
SPEED: 100 kph ARMOUR: Light
BRDM-3 ANTI-TANK VEHICLE
The Soviet BRDM/Spandrel (often called the BRDM-3) was first seen in 1977.
It has replaced the less capable BRDM-Sagger combination in front line
service. The missiles are fired from a roof mounted launcher. Some
vehicles have been seen with Spandrel/Spigot missile combination.
WEIGHT: 7.7 tons MAIN GUN: None
CREW/PASS: 3/2 MISSILES: Spandrel, 15 rds
ENGINE: 140 hp petrol SEC GUN: None
SPEED: 100 kph ARMOUR: Light
256 30MM/SA-19 SELF-PROPELLED AA VEHICLE
The Soviet 256 was first seen in 1986 in then East Germany. It appears to
be a very capable gun & missile system. Its four 30mm guns, although much
longer, probably share ammo with BMP-2. The SA-19 SAMS are IR homers and
probably have a range of 10km. It has separate search and track radars and
a laser ranger.
WEIGHT: 18.0 tons MAIN GUN: 4x30mm, 2000 rds
CREW/PASS: 4/0 MISSILES: SA-19, 8 rds
ENGINE: 520 hp diesel SEC GUN: None
SPEED: 60 kph ARMOUR: Light
PAGE 143
ZSU-23(4) "SHILKA" SELF PROPELLED AA GUN
The Soviet ZSU-23(4), or "Zoo" as it's known to western forces, entered
service in 1966. Each 23mm gun has a rate-of-fire of 1000 rpm. Its single
search/track J-band fire control radar has a range of 20 km. It's a very
effective system when employed with missile armed systems. It's also
fielded by Egypt, Syria and Iraq.
WEIGHT: 14 tons MAIN GUN: 4x23mm, 200 rds
CREW/PASS: 4/0 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 280 hp diesel SEC GUN: None
SPEED: 44 kph ARMOUR: Light
ZSU-57(2) SELF-PROPELLED AA GUN
The first post-WW2 eastern bloc AA system, the Soviet ZSU-57(2) entered
service in 1955. Its chassis is based on the T-54 tank, but with much
thinner armour. Its twin 57mm guns are quite effective in a ground fire
role, but have limited AA capability due to its mechanical reflex sight.
It's still fielded by Egypt, Syria and Iraq.
WEIGHT: 28.1 tons MAIN GUN: 2x57mm, 316 rds
CREW/PASS: 6/0 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 520 hp diesel SEC GUN: None
SPEED: 50 kph ARMOUR: Light
SA-6 "GAINFUL" SELF-PROPELLED SAM VEHICLE
The Soviet Gainful had a long and troubled development period, finally
entering service in 1967. It saw much success in the 1973 Yom Kippur War.
The SA-6 missile uses semi-active radar homing guidance. Gainful works in
conjunction with the "Straight-Flush" radar system. It's also fielded by
Egypt, Syria and Iraq.
WEIGHT: 14 tons MAIN GUN: None
CREW/PASS: 3/0 MISSILES: SA-6,3rds
ENGINE: 240hp diesel SEC GUN: None
SPEED: 44kph ARMOUR: Light
PAGE 144
SA-13 "GOPHER: SELF PROPELLED SAM VEHICLE
The Soviet Gopher entered service in 1977. In Soviet units, it`s replacing
the older Gaskin on a one-for-one basis. The SA-13 missile is very
capable. It uses radar only for ranging as the missile is an IR homer; it
has a range of 8km. The Gopher utilises a variant of the MT-LB chassis.
It`s also fielded by Syria and Iraq.
WEIGHT: 12.5tons MAIN GUN: None
CREW/PASS: 3/0 MISSILES: SA-13,4rds
ENGINE: 240hp Diesel SEC GUN: None
SPEED: 60kph ARMOUR: Light
2S1 SO-122 SELF-PROPELLED ARTILLERY VEHICLE
The Soviet "Gvozdika" (carnation) entered service in 1971. Outwardly, it`s
appearance is very similar to the US M109. The Soviets were slow to adopt
self-propelled artilery, continuing to rely on towed weapons. SP`s are
less vunerable to counter battery fire and provide crew protection. It`s
also fielded by Syria and Iraq.
WEIGHT: 16 tons MAIN GUN: None
CREW/PASS: 4/0 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 240hp diesel SEC GUN: One MG
SPEED: 60kph ARMOUR: Light
PAGE 145
S60 ANTI AIRCRAFT GUN
The Soviet S-60 is indicative of the many types and calibres of towed/fixed
anti-aircraft guns still in use today. While limited in their flexibility,
they are as accurate, or more accurate in some cases than their
self-propelled counterparts. Towed guns are fielded by many nations
including most middle eastern nations.
WEIGHT: 4.5 tons MAIN GUN: 57mm,200rds
CREW/PASS: 7/0 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: None SEC GUN: None
SPEED: Towed ARMOUR: None
SA-3 "GOA" LOW/MEDIUM ALTITUDE SAM SYSTEM
The Soviet Goa is obsolete by today`s standards; it entered service in
1961. Aircraft counter-measures have made significant advances rendering
missiles of the Goa era almost useless. However, there`s always luck. The
Goa is a radar beam rider; it works with the "Low Blow" radar system. It`s
also fielded by Iraq.
WEIGHT: 7.0 tons MAIN GUN: None
CREW/PASS: 3/0 MISSILES: SA-3,4rds
ENGINE: None SEC GUN: None
SPEED: Towed ARMOUR: None
PAGE 146
MI-24W "HIND-E" GUNSHIP
The Soviet Hind first appeared in 1972. It was originally designed as a
heavily armed assault helicopter, but has evolved into a capable gunship.
It lacks the nap-of-the-earth maneuvrability of its western counterparts.
Still, it carries a heavy load, and has retained its transport capacity.
It's also flown by Syria and Iraq.
WEIGHT: 12 tons MAIN GUN: 12.7mm
CREW/PASS: 2/8 MISSILES: Spiral ATGM.
ENGINE: two 2,200 shp ROCKETS: SA-7 AAM
MAX SPEED: 295 kph WEAPON LOAD: 2.4 tons
MI-8TBK "HIP-E" TRANSPORT HELICOPTER
When it first appeared in 1961, the Soviet Hip was a simple, quasi-military
transport helicopter. After years of modifications, the Hip has evolved
into one of the most widely accepted military helicopters with over 10,000
in use. It's described as the most heavily armed assault helicopter. It's
flown by Egypt, Syria and Iraq.
WEIGHT: 11.2 tons MAIN GUN: 12.7mm
CREW/PASS: 2/28 MISSILES: Swatter ATGM
Rockets
ENGINE: two 1,700 shp
MAX SPEED: 130 kts WEAPON LOAD: 3 tons
PAGE 147
MI-28 "HAVOC" GUNSHIP
Often described as the Soviet Apache, the Havoc completed pre-production
testing in 1989. A true gunship, as opposed to the Hind's hybrid approach,
the Havoc's narrow silhouette and tandem seating are much more suited to
its role. Its high speed agility has also been enhanced by anew rotor
structure.
WEIGHT: 11.4 tons MAIN GUN: 30mm, 300 rds
CREW/PASS: 2/0 MISSILES: Spiral ATGM, Rockets
SA-14 AAM
ENGINE: two 2,200 shp
MAX SPEED: 165 kts WEAPON LOAD: 3 tons
KA-34 "HOKUM" COMBAT HELICOPTER
By 1990, the Soviet Hokum was still in the testing stage. The exact role
of the helicopter is not yet known. Kamov (Ka) helicopters have always
been produced mainly for maritime roles. It may be intended for amphibious
assault escort or anti-helicopter combat. It has the distinctive Kamov
mark of contra-rotating rotors.
WEIGHT: 7.5 tons MAIN GUN: 30mm, 300 rds
CREW/PASS: 2/0 MISSILES: Spiral ATGM, Rockets
SA-14 AAm
ENGINE: two 2,200 shp
MAX SPEED: 190 kts WEAPON LOAD: 2.3 tons
PAGE 148
SA-342 GAZELLE UTILITY HELICOPTER
The French Gazelle first flew in 1967. It has been utilised in many
different roles, from recon, liason and light attack, and many civilian
applications. A disguised Gazelle was used in the filming of the movie
Blue Thunder. It has been exported to over 41 nations including Great
Britain, Egypt, Syria, Kuwait, Qatar and Iraq.
WEIGHT: 2.1 tons MAIN GUN: None
CREW/PASS: 2/3 MISSILES: Hot ATGM, Rockets,
SA-7 AAM.
ENGINE: one 858 shp
MAX SPEED: 140 kts WEAPON LOAD: 1.2 tons
OSA-11 CLASS GUIDED MISSILE PATROL BOAT
A replacement for the earlier OSA-I boats, the OSA-II's have been in
service since 1966. A favourite of many smaller or developing nations,
these boats can provide an instant navy at low cost. The SA-N-5 SAM is the
navalized version of the SA-7 Grail. Said to be poor sea boats with
temperamental engines.
WEIGHT: 245 tons MAIN GUN: 4x30mm
CREW/PASS: 30/0 MISSILES: Styx SSM,Rockets
SA-N-5 SAM
ENGINE: 15,000 hp
MAX SPEED: 140 kts AIRCRAFT: None
PAGE 149
T-4 CLASS LANDING CRAFT
The Soviet T-4 class has been in service since 1954. It's not all that
different from the landing craft that saw action during WW2.
WEIGHT: 70 tons MAIN GUN: None
CREW/PASS: 5/50 MISSILES: None
ENGINE: 600 hp AIRCRAFT: None
MAX SPEED: 10 kts LOAD: 1xTank
PAGE 151
APPENDIX
--------
REGIONAL DEPLOYMENTS
--------------------
CENTRAL EUROPE
--------------
CURRENT EVENTS
This area has gone through more change, in a short period of time, than any
regional area in the twentieth-century. Ten years ago, no one could have
predicted what is now taking place.
Germany is re-united and the Warsaw Pact has collapsed into a
quasi-political organisation; its military teeth are gone. Civil and
political strife continues to escalate in the Soviet Union; this has
further de-stabilized the region.
The Soviet Union is a giant teetering on the brink of civil war. The old
guard conservatives and the liberal progressives (right-wing moderates by
our standards) are each vying for control of the country. Whoever
ultimately evolves as the victor will have a far-reaching effect on the
military stability of the region.
Western Europe is a very appealing target. Its consumer goods, resources,
technology and labour force are hard to ignore. The Soviet Union,
regardless of who wins political supremacy, has tremendous "needs" and
corresponding expectations. They will get the goods one way or another.
The ex-Soviet client states are also a potential hotbed. Their new found
freedom has opened the door for secularism to again rear its ugly head.
There have been clashes between the Czechs and Slovaks, and the Baltic
States are constantly at odds with their old master.
These internal conflicts have a habit of escalating to major proportions
and drawing in other "interested parties".
MILITARY BALANCE
Even without the non-Soviet Warsaw Pact Forces, the Soviet Union can still
field over 3,000,000 men just in the land forces. Equipment includes over
50,000 tanks, 70,000 IFVs and APCs, 60,000 pieces of artillery and over
4.500 helicopters. There's no question that a portion of the equipment is
obsolete and is no longer of first line status, even by Soviet standards.
PAGE 152
The Conventional Forces in Europe Treaty (CFE) is being touted by many as
the greatest peace initiative since the Treaty of Ghent. Don't be fooled
by all the rhetoric.
The CFE treaty calls for equal force limits in five broad categories MBTs,
AFVs, artillery pieces, combat aircraft and armed helicopters. These
categories were arbitrarily selected because of their reference to
"offensive" weapons. These limits affect the forces fielded by all treaty
signers (it was signed by the 212 members of NATO and the Warsaw Pact. The
immediate result of the treaty - many nations, especially the Soviet Union,
must dispose of tons of military equipment.
Here's were it gets sticky. The treaty simply allows the Soviet Union to
dispose of outdated equipment or to just hold or store it east of the Ural
mountains. Only the countries physically located in Europe must
permanently dispose of their equipment.
Ofcourse, the USA aLsO benefits frOm this appareNt "loonhole". Much of the
US equipment must be stationed outside of Europe (the Persian Gulf region,
for example) or returned to the USA. The question is, how long will it
take to move it back?
The area boasts of some of the most fertile ground found in the world.
Parts are mountainous or heavily forested, while others are as flat and
clear as the plains of Kansas. Towns and villages dot a countryside cut by
many small rivers and their tributaries and criss-crossed by a highly
developed road and rail net.
Soviet forces cross the border into the new Germany after "rescuing" Poland
from Western European dominance. Economic woes and a restless, impatient
populace prompt the new conservative Soviet government to use military
might to quickly solve their problems. After all, the aggressive Western
Europeans, backed by the equally aggressive USA, have forced them to take
this action to protect their borders.
As part of the US V Corp, you must stern the Soviet tide to buy time for
the mobilization of all NATO forces and the re-deployment of US forces from
other regions.
PAGE 153
PERSIAN GULF
------------
CURRENT EVENTS
The recent events in this region have been near and dear to all of our
hearts. It couldn`t have had a better ending if it had been written as a
hollywood movie script. Still, conflict is a way of life here.
The region has seen constant war dating back to biblical times. In
addition to the most recent UN sanctioned action, the past 50 years have
witnessed constant civil wars and changes of government (mostly bloody),
five Arab-Israeli conflicts, regional clashes, terrorism, internal genocide
and a proracted war between Iran/Iraq...not a pretty picture when you think
about it.
It remains an extremely volatile region. The coalition force that fought
in Operations Desert Storm and Sabre are held together by a thread.
Countries now stand beside allies whom they only recently fought as
enemies. The smallest provocation could trigger a confrontation between
these strange bedfellows.
No-one has forgotten the old hatreds, there was just something else a
little more pressing.
The poor Arab states hate the rich Arab states;the communist Arab states
hate the monarchies; most of the Arab states hate the Israelis and the
Egyptians because they don`t like the Israelis this year; and the Iranians
generally hate Arabs because they`re Arabs, not Persians. In addition to
all this, Lebanon looks like a wasteland since just about everyone is using
it as a pin cushion to work out their differences.
In spite of this, don`t let anyone tell you different, oil is the focus.
That`s not to say that these other issues are just passing fancies. It`s a
matter of the have nots wanting what the haves have, or the haves wanting
more. Economics, not politics is calling the shots.
MILITARY BALANCE
The recent conflict has left the area in a very fluid state, to say the
least. In spite of the drubbing they took, the Iraqis still posess a large
fighting force - even if most of them are now on foot. How many men remain
in uniform and how much equipment is still in Iraqi hands is unknown. They
were able to save the majority of their aircraft by flying them over the
border to Iran.
To the east of Iraq is Iran; not one of our closest allies by any stretch
of the imagination. They appear to be perched like vultures; waiting to
pounce on any opportunity. They field a 750,000 man army,but modern
mechanised equipment is limited or in disrepair.
PAGE 154
Another potential antagonist is Syria. They have never really cared for
the rich royalty of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. After all, Syria doesn't have
much oil to speak of - see, that oil issue again! They only went along
with the coalition not being as shortsighted as Jordan, because they knew
Iraq couldn't win. There was a lot of money to be had from those same rich
Arabs. They have a 400,000 man army, with the equipment to back them up.
While always considered a bit suspect militarily, they can't be overlooked.
With the exception of Israel and Egypt, the other Arab States field rather
small forces.
This is a desert region, pretty much hot, flat and generally barren. The
cities are situated on the coasts, with the exception of the
Tigris-Euphrates valley (the fountain of life - a bit of irony) that runs
through most of Iraq. The topography of Iran is, however, quite different.
It's fairly mountainous and water is plentiful.
Still licking her wounds from the last war and bitter about the UN imposed
sanctions, Iraq allies with Iran (that was part of the plan all along) and
launches a renewed offensive into Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. They have
managed to "buy" off Syria who decides to sit this one out.
As part of the standing US Persian Gulf force, you must hold the line while
the RDF is staged into the region.
PAGE 155
WEAPONS EFFECTIVENESS CHART
----------------------------
SAM THREAT CHARACTERISTICS
BACKUP BACKUP
WEAPON TRACKING TRACKING GUIDANCE GUIDANCE USE
SA-7B "Grail" none none IR(C) none man-portable
SA-14A "Gremlin" none none IR(B) none man-portable
SA-16A "Goblin" none none IR(B+) none man-portable
SA-3B "Goa" radar visual radar(D) visual fixed battery
SA-6B "Gainful" radar none radar(C) visual vehicle mounted
SA-9B "Gaskin" visual none IR(C+) none vehicle mounted
SA-11A "Gadfly" radar none radar(B) visual vehicle mounted
SA-13A"Gopher" radar visual IR(B) none vehicle mounted
SA-19A radar visual laser(A) IR(A) vehicle mounted
NOTES ON USE:e
Man-portable SAMs are utilised by infantry, carried in APCs and most light
vehicles and used to defend structures. Guidance system effectiveness
evaluates use against helicopters.
AAA THREAT CHARACTERISTICS
WEAPON TRACKING TRACKING BACKUP USE
EFF
S-60 57mm radar visual C towed gun
ZU-23 23mm visual visual C+ towed gun
ZSU-57(2) visual visual D vehicle system
ZSU-23(4) radar visual B vehicle system
2S6 radar laser A vehicle system
NOTES ON USE:
------------
Effectiveness evaluates use against helicopters.
PAGE 156
WEAPON SYSTEMS
MAX RANGE "A" TARGETS "D" TARGETS
1,500 m Medium armoured, heavy armoured
unarmoured, all aircraft
1,500 m light armoured, heavy armoured
unarmoured, all aircraft
1,000 m unarmoured armoured aircraft
2,000 m all armoured,naval unarmoured
2,000 m unarmoured helicopters armoured
2,000 m medium armoured, heavy armoured
unarmoured
4,000 m all armoured, naval unarmoured
6,000 m all armoured, unarmoured
helicopters, naval
8,000 m all armoured, unarmoured
helicopters, naval
15,000 m all radar sources aircraft
25,000 m all armoured naval aircraft
40,000 m naval land based,
aircraft
18,000 m all aircraft land/sea based
5,000 m most aircraft land/sea based
7,000 m medium armoured, heavy armoured
helicopters
PAGE 157
GLOSSARY
AA: Anti-aircraft. Guns designed to shoot down aircraft.
AAA: Anti-aircraft artillery; also referred to as "triple-A".
Used mostly to refer to heavy AA guns, but is generally
synonymous with AA.
AAM: Air-to-air missile.
ADF: Automatic Direction Finding. A device to home in on
transmitted navigational signals.
AFCS: Automatic flight control system. This device provides
the control mechanisms for the autopilot and auto-hover
systems.
AGM: Air-to-ground missile
AH-xx: US designation for attack helicopters. Examples are AH-64
Apache and AH-66 Comanche.
APC: Armoured Personnel Carrier. A tracked or wheeled vehicle
that transports an infantry squad. Most carry machine-gun
type weapons.
AFV: Armoured fighting vehicle. Armoured vehicle designed for
front line combat.
APR-39: Lightweight digital threat warning system. Designed for
use on helicopters and light fixed-wing aircraft. It's
optimised for NOE flight.
APU: Auxiliary power unit.
ATGM: Anti-tank guided missile. A powered missile guided by
wire, radio, infrared or laser commands. TOW-2 and
Hellfire are ATGM.
AUX Power Unit: Auxiliary power unit. Small on-board turbine engine used
to provide power to start the main engines.
Battalion: A military organization with two or more companies.
Cavalry or helicopter battalions are often called
"Squadrons". It typically has 500 to 1,500 men.
PAGE 158
BMP-x: Bronevaya Maschina Piekhota. Soviet built IFV.
BRDM-x: Bronevaya Razvedyvatelnaya Dozomaya Maschina. Soviet
built reconnaissance vehicle.
Brigade: In the US Army, a military organisation with two or more
battalions. It typically has 3,000 to 6,000 men.
BTR-xx: Bronetransportr. Soviet built wheeled APC.
CBU: Cluster bomb unit. A bomb that bursts in to many smaller
bomblets; utilised to cover a wide area.
Chaff: Radar decoy. Composed of thousands of different sized
metal film strips. Produces varying radar reflections.
CM: Counter-measures. Jammers and decoys.
CO: The commanding officer.
Collective: Helicopter flight control used to "collectively" change
the pitch of the main rotor blades.
Commo: Communications.
Company: A military organisation with two or more platoons.
Cavalry or helicopter companies are often called "Troops".
It typically has 100 to 300 men.
CP/G: Co-pilot/gunner. The "front seater" in helicopters with
tandem seating (rear seater in the Comanche). The CP/G
sits on the left in helicopters with side-by-side seating.
Cyclic: Helicopter flight control used to selectively change the
pitch of the main rotor blades.
Ditch: A term for crash landing.
FARP: Forward arming & refuelling point. A highly mobile
helicopter base; it's normally airlifted by heavy
transport helicopters.
Fast Movers: Slang term for conventional jet aircraft.
PAGE 159
Flare: A cartridge shaped source of intense heat energy. Normally
launched in groups of three cartridges each with a
different heat frequency.
FLIR: Forward looking infrared. Sighting device that "reads" the
heat signature of objects.
FLOT: Forward line, own troops. Current designation for the line
closest to the enemy.
Flying a Desk: Staff or command job with no flight duties.
GPS: Global positioning system. Satellite based navigation
system.
HEAT: High explosive, anti-tank. A type of warhead designed to
punch through steel armour. Fitted on most ATGMs.
Heavy Section: Helicopter flight group composed of three helicopters.
HQ: Head Quarters.
HUD: Head-up display. A piece of glass mounted on the front of
the cockpit, arranged so the pilot can look forward through
the glass. Important combat and flight information is
reflected off the HUD. The images are superimposed over
the outside world; the pilot can look through the HUD and
retain the images.
ICS: Internal communication system. Used for communication
within a helicopter.
IFV: Infantry fighting vehicle. A tracked vehicle that
transports an infantry squad. Usually armed with small
calibre cannons.
In Constraints: Term used to describe when a weapon is within its maximum
range and target envelope.
INS: Inertial navigation system. A device that tracks
helicopter's current position and desired destinations.
IR: Infrared. A portion of the electro-magnetic spectrum where
the intensity of the signal is related to its heat signature.
ITV: Improved TOW vehicle. The current US TOW platform - the
M901.
PAGE 160
JAMMER: A scource ofintense infrared or radar energy used to confuse
or "spoof" weapon systems.
Ka-xx: Helicopters designed by the Soviet Kamov Bureau.
Klick: Slang for Kilometre
Knot: A measure of horizontal motion equal to 1.1 miles per hour
LGB: Laser glide bomb. A bomb guided by reflected laser energy.
Light section: Helicopter flight group composed of two helicopters.
LZ: Landing zone.
Mask/Unmask: Terms used to describe the use of naturally occuring
objects as cover
MBT: Main battle tank.
MEDEVAC: Medical evacuation. The transportation of wounded troops.
MFD: Multi-function display.
Mi-xx: Helicopters designed by the Soviet Mil Bureau.
MiG-xx: Aircraft designed by the Mikoyan-Gurevich Bureau.
MPSM: Multi-purpose submunition. A type of new Hydra 70 rocket
system for helicopters. The M261 rocket has 9 bomblets, or
submunitions, each with it`s own explosive charge per rocket.
MRLS: Multiple rocket launching system. The newest Western
artillery rocket system.
NATO: The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation.A mutual defence
treaty that includes 16 nations. They are all European
based with the exception of the United States and Canada
NATO is important to the central European front, because it
forms the basis whereby US, British and Canadian forces are
stationed in Germany.
OH-XX: US. designation for observation helicopters. Example is
OH-58D Kiowa Warrior.
Passage
point: Safe, no-fire area for flight through friendly troops.
PAGE 161
Platoon: The military organisation subordinate to a company. It
typically has 25 to 30 men.
Primary: The most important mission of a flight.
Pull Pitch: To quickly add collective control
RDF: Rapid Deployment Force. A US military force composed of
"quick" move military formations. It`s intended to be used
as a timely response to "hotspots" around the world.
Reticle: A small, circular glass positiond over the right eye.
Important combat and flight information is reflected off the
reticle, not unlike the HUD. The images are superimposed
over the outside world; the pilot can look in any direction
and still retain the images.
S2: Battalion level intelligence officer. He finds and
summarises all information about the enemy.
SAM: Surface-to-Air missiles
SEAD: Suppression of enemy air defences. A term to describe a
mission to destroy enemy air defence units.
Secondary: Targets of lesser importance than the primary.
SOP: Standard operating procedure. Doing it by the "book" or
operating manual.
SSM: Surface to surface missile.
Su-xx: Aircraft designed by the Soviet Sukhoi Bureau.
TADS: Target acquisition and designation system. A device mounted
on the Apache helicopter that`s used to lock onto targets
and control the laser designator.
TF: Task Force. A battalion or squadron sized combat formation
composed of mixed combat elements
Thermal
Imager: Similar to a FLIR, but "tuned" to objects more than
structures.
PAGE 162
TOC: Tactical operations centre. A small command tent. usually
set up in the field
UH-xx: US designation for utility helicopters. Example is UH-60k/L
Blackhawk.
Visiononics: A collective term to describe all helicopter mounted sighting
devices.
VOR: VHF omni-directional range. A radio beacon used for
navigation.
Warsaw
Pact: Formed as a counter to NATO, it was origionally composed of 7
eastern European nations. It was a purely military
organisation dominated by the Soviet Union. It has now
dissolved into a loose political group.
Waypoint: An interim navigational point used in conjunction with
the INS:
Weapons
Free: A term used to describe full freedom to utilise weapons
against targets.
PAGE 163
DESIGNER`S NOTES
----------------
THE PLAN
It was a bit scary when MicroProse`s President, Bill Stealey, origionally
proposed a sequal to the highly successful Gunship. The first thought that
came to mind was, how could we possibly top that product?
After the smelling salts were passed around, we started to kick around a
few ideas. That really got the creative juices flowing, and it started to
seem like a great idea-now we wished we had said it first.
We knew that the new simulator had to be much broader in scope than the
origional. It would have to include most of the neat helicopters that the
Army (sorry Marines, we`ll give you equal time at a later scenario)
currently have in their inventory, plus ones that are still on the drawing
board. This futuristic perspective is where the 2000 in the title comes
from.
We were lucky in one respect. Early on we guessed that the army would
select the Boeing/Sikorsky version of the LHX, now designated the AH-661A
Comanche.We knew that if we went in that direction, we were committed,
since the army wasn`t going to make it`s final selection until April of
1991. You know what they always say-I would rather be lucky than good.
We also wanted to expand into the operational components of
multi-helicopter command. Not that flying a single helicopter can`t be fun
(after all, we did retain that capability) it`s just that there`s more to
helicopter operations.
We tried to go to extremes to capture the "realism" of helicopter combat.
Real action doesn`t take place at 2000 feet. It happens right next to the
ground. You feel like you`re going to suck the leaves right off the trees
as you fly by. This is why Gunship 2000 is the way that it is. We wanted
you right next to the ground, weaving in and out of the canyons and between
the hills just like the real pilots.
We made the "bad guys" act like bad guys, to a point- we still wanted you
to have fun. After all, this is supposed to be fun, not work. We only
took a few liberties with the realism.
The selection of the Persian Gulf was made, believe it or not , long before
the actual conflict erupted in that region. It`s not that we have a corner
on crystal balls; the region has been a hotbed for years. It was really a
pretty easy call. It`s lucky the real thing worked out as well as it did.
We never intended to capitalise on the conflict; we`re happy to strictly
deal in "simulating" the actions.
The selection of Central Europe as the other theatre was not an attempt at
any political statement, or a prediction of impending doom and gloom. It's
just that the US has a large standing force in the region, in spite of the
forces tranferred to the Persian Gulf. Since Gunship 2000 is a simulation,
we're simulating what could happen IF, a war did break out. The terrain
found in the region also gave us the chance to show off Gunship 2000's new
3-D system.
THE TEAM
Many people contributed to the making of Gunship 2000; I apologise to those
not specificaLly mentiOned. It was a team effort, and we had a great team!
Early ON, we realiSed that we certainly couldn't utilise the 3-D system
from the original Gunship and the 3-D system used in our other 3-D
products, such as F-19 and F-15II, didn't provide a low level view of the
terrain. We just had to design a new system.
This is where Darrell Dennies worked his magic. Darrell started on the
system, now dubbed Topographical 3-D, back in February of 1990. He
developed an entirely new concept to emphasise and accent the terrain where
helicopters operate. The results of his efforts speak for themselves. The
worlds are rich in colour and depth of detail. The terrain features aren't
just painted on the ground,they actually "fit" into one another as they do
in real life. You can actually look through the railroad tunnel to the
other side! The terrain also includes fills and "fancy" patterns on the
ground and even the trees. In the campaign game, the structures destroyed
in previous missions are still destroyed when you find them again; the
train even moves along the railroad tracks. This system is the most
complex 3-D model yet developed by MicroProse; it's probably superior to
anything you've seen.
Darrell also programmed all of the "fight" related functions. He never
ceased to amaze us all. One moment there could be a problem with a
function or feature, and before you could bat an eye, Darrell had it
corrected or added to the game. There wasn't anything Darrell couldn't fix
or, somehow, squeeze into the programme.
PAGE 165
The mission generation system was developed, and for the most part
designed, by Detmar Peterke. He had the patience and insight to interpret
my obscure concepts into something that would work. It wasn't easy coming
up with a system that would generate challenging missions that could still
be fun. He developed the "action area" system that's used for selecting
options. Detmar, with the help of Dave McKibbin, also "tweaked" all of the
nifty animations into the game.
Detmar applied an "artist's eye" to his programming this touch is reflected
in the "look" of the game's starting and ending sequences. It's not often
that you find this rare combination of talents.
Speaking of art, we couldn't have been more fortunate than to have Mike
Reis as a member of the team. He spent many long, tiring hours designing
and drawing all of the terrific art. The screens aren't just scanned
images or touch ups of other people's art, they're original and hand drawn.
His art has the look of real "live imagery"; you get the feeling that
you're standing in the room or sitting in the tent. That's a lot of pixels
and colours to worry about!
I know Mike often wanted to say "not you again" whenever we walked into his
office with another change or idea, but he put up with us constantly
critiquing or suggesting changes to the art. It's a good thing he's not
thin-skinned; he probably would have "skinned" us many times over-and
deservedly so.
I would be remiss in not thanking Max Remington for his terrific 3-D
objects. He out did himself again! Max is known as the "machine" around
these parts. Whatever you ask for, he produces, no matter how complex or
obscure. The helicopters in Gunship 2000 are the most complex objects
we've ever included in a simulation; and, it's not like he had the luxury
of working in an environment of unlimited capacity-he still had to make it
fit.
Jeff Briggs wrote all of the music that you hear during the game. He did a
great job in capturing and setting the "mood" of the game. He had to write
them all as original compositions,and had to try to make them fit within
the presentation of the game. This wasn't an easy task. In many cases he
had only concepts to work from.
Ken Lagace along with Jim McConkey and Scott Patterson produced all of the
game's sound effects. If you're lucky enough to have a Roland or Adlib
sound card, you can experience the exciting sounds of helicopter flight and
combat.
Iris Idokogi and her staff of thousands (just kidding, the printed material
looks so good, you would think it really took that many people to develop
it) are to thank for the printed material. They're the group that usually
gets the least amount of time. We designers always try to wait until the
last minute to finish writing the manual. Fortunately, Iris is persistent,
and she doesn't let us get away with too much.
I tip my hat to the quality assurance folks; they have the toughest row to
hoe. They are tasked with finding all of the things that don't work. No
one is ever happy to see or hear from them, but their job is a key part of
the process. Chris Taormino and the gang did a great job in keeping all of
us honest.
After all that, it leaves the design element of the game-that's me. I did
what all designers do at MicroProse-research & develop the scope and flow
of the game, and basically annoy everyone else. I also wrote the
documentation, with the help of Sean Gallagher, and developed all of the
charts, tables and miscellaneous text.
One part of the game I really enjoyed doing, at least I thought so when I
started it, was designing the terrain and layouts for the 6 worlds in
Gunship 2000. Darrell developed a number or tools specifically for this
portion of the game that made my life easier. About 150 unique tiles were
created for the worlds. Each world has over 4,000 "tiles" that are linked
together to make the terrain look uniform. I started to dream about these
tiles; I was smart enough not to tell my wife that she had been displaced
in my dreams.
The whole idea behind the game was to capture the essence of helicopter
combat, and to present it in an enjoyable, entertaining format. I believe
we were successful. Only you can truly judge the results.
Jim Day
END
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
/--------------------------*----------------------------------\
;|GREETZ FLY OUT TO:\/IDEO /\/ASTY : SKUZ Bsc:DaBbLe: WOLVERINE|,
|CYGNUS/LSD : EEK A MOUZE : HYBRID : SCOOTER : CRYSTAL : SK!N |
/ : AMBL!N : |\|ISSA|\| : RYGAR : BASER EVIL : SPOOK : XTC : \
:\ QUARTEX! : DECADE : RAZOR 1911 : GLOBAL OVERDOSE : PARADOX : /:
. |TnT : FAIRLIGHT : MINISTRY : DYNAMIX : ANTHROX : BLACKHAWK : | .
|CHEM/SUBMISSION : BILL/ASYLUM : + ALL THE KEWL ELITE MEMBERS |
\--------------------------*----------------------------------/
: :
THE LoOnS - SiMPLY NUTTY!
1 9 9 3.